Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Peritoneal Ultrafiltration for Heart Failure: Lessons from a Randomised Controlled Trial

Dukka, Hari; Kalra, Philip A.; Wilkie, Martin; Bhandari, Sunil; Davies, Simon J.; Barratt, Jonathan; Squire, Iain; Odudu, Aghogho; Selby, Nicholas M.; Mcintyre, Christopher; Robertson, Fiona; Taal, Maarten W.

Peritoneal Ultrafiltration for Heart Failure: Lessons from a Randomised Controlled Trial Thumbnail


Authors

Hari Dukka

Philip A. Kalra

Martin Wilkie

Sunil Bhandari

Simon J. Davies

Jonathan Barratt

Iain Squire

Aghogho Odudu

Nicholas M. Selby

Christopher Mcintyre

Fiona Robertson



Abstract

Peritoneal ultrafiltration (PuF) has been employed for severe heart failure (HF), but evidence for its benefit is lacking. The Peritoneal Dialysis for Heart Failure (PDHF) study was a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which aimed to investigate this issue. The trial stopped early due to inadequate recruitment. We describe methods, trial activity, and lessons learned.

The trial aimed to recruit 130 participants with severe diuretic-resistant HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] 3/4) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3/4 on optimal medical treatment for ≥ 4 weeks from 6 UK centers. Participants were randomized to either continuation of conventional HF treatment or to additionally receiving PuF (1 overnight exchange using Icodextrin dialysate). Primary outcome was change in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) between baseline and 28 weeks (end of trial). Secondary outcomes were changes in patient reported quality of life as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, short form 36 (SF 36) health survey results, hospitalization, and mortality.

Over a 2-year period, 290 patients were screened from which only 20 met inclusion criteria and 10 were recruited. Reasons for ineligibility were fluctuating estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), suboptimal HF treatment, frailty, and patients being too unwell for randomization. Barriers to recruitment included patient frailty, with some participants considered only when they were at end of life, unwillingness to engage in an invasive therapy, and suboptimal coordination between cardiology and renal services. This is a challenging patient group in which to perform research, and lessons learned from the peritoneal dialysis (PD)-HF trial will be helpful in the planning of future studies in this area.

Citation

Dukka, H., Kalra, P. A., Wilkie, M., Bhandari, S., Davies, S. J., Barratt, J., …Taal, M. W. (2019). Peritoneal Ultrafiltration for Heart Failure: Lessons from a Randomised Controlled Trial. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 39(5), 486-489. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00272

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 1, 2019
Online Publication Date Sep 1, 2019
Publication Date Sep 1, 2019
Deposit Date May 10, 2019
Publicly Available Date Aug 11, 2022
Print ISSN 0896-8608
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 39
Issue 5
Pages 486-489
DOI https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00272
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2039266
Publisher URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3747/pdi.2018.00272