Amal Mohammed
Evaluation of progestogen supplementation for luteal phase support in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles
Mohammed, Amal; Woad, Kathryn J.; Mann, George E.; Craigon, Jim; Raine-Fenning, Nick; Robinson, Robert S.
Authors
KATIE WOAD katie.woad@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
George E. Mann
Jim Craigon
NICK RAINE-FENNING Nick.Raine-fenning@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Associate Professor & Reader in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery
Dr BOB ROBINSON BOB.ROBINSON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Abstract
© 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of progestogen supplementation in improving clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing fresh IVF cycles and to compare different routes, start times, durations, and estrogen coadministration regimen. Design: Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: University. Patient(s): Women undergoing fresh IVF cycles who did and did not receive progestogen supplementation. Intervention(s): Summary odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by binomial logistic regression. Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rates. Result(s): Eighty-two articles (26,726 women) were included. Clinical pregnancy rates were increased by IM (OR = 4.57), vaginal (OR = 3.34), SC (OR = 3.36), or oral (OR = 2.57) progestogen supplementation versus no treatment. The greatest benefit was observed when progestogens were supplemented IM versus vaginally (OR = 1.37). The optimal time to commence administration was between oocyte retrieval and ET (OR = 1.31), with oocyte retrieval +1 day being most beneficial. Coadministration of estrogen had no benefit (OR = 1.33), whether progestogens were coadministered vaginally or IM. Clinical pregnancy rates were equivalent when progestogen supplementation was ceased after ≤3 weeks or continued for up to 12 weeks (OR = 1.06). Conclusion(s): This broad-ranging meta-analysis highlights the need to reevaluate current clinical practice. The use of progestogens in fresh IVF cycles is substantially beneficial to clinical pregnancy. Critically, the use of IM progestogens should not be dismissed, as it yielded the greatest clinical pregnancy rates. Pregnancy success was impacted by initiation of therapy, with 1 day after oocyte retrieval being optimal. There is little evidence to support coadministration of estrogen or prolonging progestogen treatment beyond 3 weeks.
Citation
Mohammed, A., Woad, K. J., Mann, G. E., Craigon, J., Raine-Fenning, N., & Robinson, R. S. (2019). Evaluation of progestogen supplementation for luteal phase support in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 112(3), 491-502.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.021
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 11, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 11, 2019 |
Publication Date | 2019-09 |
Deposit Date | Apr 12, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 12, 2020 |
Journal | Fertility and Sterility |
Print ISSN | 0015-0282 |
Electronic ISSN | 1556-5653 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 112 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 491-502.e3 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.021 |
Keywords | Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Reproductive Medicine |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1786282 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028219303966?via%3Dihub |
Contract Date | Apr 12, 2019 |
Files
2019 Fs 27600 Mohammed Et Al Accepted Publication
(937 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Luteal angiogenesis and its control
(2016)
Journal Article
Gene expression profiling of breast tumours from New Zealand patients
(2017)
Journal Article
Maternal protein restriction affects fetal ovary development in sheep
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search