YASUHIRO KOTERA Yasuhiro.Kotera@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
YASUHIRO KOTERA Yasuhiro.Kotera@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
STEFAN RENNICK EGGLESTONE Stefan.Rennick_egglestone@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Research Fellow
DR FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Anne Mclaren Fellow
JOY LLEWELLYN-BEARDSLEY Joy.Llewellyn-Beardsley@nottingham.ac.uk
Peer Research Assistant
YASMIN ALI Yasmin.Ali2@nottingham.ac.uk
Research Assistant on The Narrative Experiences Online (Neon) Study
CHRISTOPHER NEWBY Christopher.Newby@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Medical Statistician
Caroline Yeo
Emily Slade
Simon Bradstreet
Julian Harrison
Donna Franklin
OLAMIDE TODOWEDE Olamide.Todowede@nottingham.ac.uk
Research Fellow
MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion
Demand for digital health interventions is increasing in many countries. The use of recorded mental health recovery narratives in digital health interventions is becoming more widespread in clinical practice. Mental health recovery narratives are first-person lived experience accounts of recovery from mental health problems, including struggles and successes over time. Helpful impacts of recorded mental health recovery narratives include connectedness with the narrative and validation of experiences. Possible harms include feeling disconnected and excluded from others. Diverse narrative collections from many types of narrators and describing multiple ways to recover are important, to maximize the opportunity for service users to benefit through connection, and to minimize the likelihood of harm. Mental health clinicians need to know whether narrative collections are sufficiently diverse to recommend to service users. However, no method exists for assessing diversity and inclusivity of existing or new narrative collections. We argue assessing diversity and inclusivity is the next frontier in mental health recovery narrative research and practice. This is important but methodologically and ethically complex. In this viewpoint article, we evaluated one diversity and two inclusivity assessment methods. The diversity assessment method used Simpson’s Diversity Index. The two
inclusivity assessment methods were based on comparator demographic rates and arbitrary thresholds. These methods were applied to four narrative collections as a case study. Refinement needs to be made regarding a narrative assessment tool, practicality and cultural adaptation.
Kotera, Y., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Ng, F., Llewellyn-Beardsley, J., Ali, Y., Newby, C., …Slade, M. Assessing diversity and inclusivity is the next frontier in mental health recovery narrative research and practice (Preprint)
Deposit Date | Jan 9, 2023 |
---|---|
Publicly Available Date | Jan 9, 2023 |
Keywords | Psychiatry and Mental health |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/15718497 |
Publisher URL | https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44601/submitted |
Assessing diversity and inclusivity is the next frontier in mental health recovery narrative research and practice
(664 Kb)
PDF
Common Humanity as an Under-acknowledged Mechanism for Mental Health Peer Support
(2022)
Journal Article
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: openaccess@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Advanced Search