TNG KWOK Tng.Kwok@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Research Fellow in Neonatal Medicine
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis with validation
Kwok, T’ng Chang; Batey, Natalie; Luu, Ka Ling; Prayle, Andrew; Sharkey, Don
Authors
Natalie Batey
Ka Ling Luu
Andrew Prayle
DON SHARKEY don.sharkey@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Neonatal Medicine and Technologies
Abstract
Abstract: Prediction models could identify infants at the greatest risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and allow targeted preventative strategies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with external validation of identified models. Studies using predictors available before day 14 of life to predict BPD in very preterm infants were included. Two reviewers assessed 7628 studies for eligibility. Meta-analysis of externally validated models was followed by validation using 62,864 very preterm infants in England and Wales. A total of 64 studies using 53 prediction models were included totalling 274,407 infants (range 32–156,587/study). In all, 35 (55%) studies predated 2010; 39 (61%) were single-centre studies. A total of 97% of studies had a high risk of bias, especially in the analysis domain. Following meta-analysis of 22 BPD and 11 BPD/death composite externally validated models, Laughon’s day one model was the most promising in predicting BPD and death (C-statistic 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.81) and good calibration). Six models were externally validated in our cohort with C-statistics between 0.70 and 0.90 but with poor calibration. Few BPD prediction models were developed with contemporary populations, underwent external validation, or had calibration and impact analyses. Contemporary, validated, and dynamic prediction models are needed for targeted preventative strategies. Impact: This review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of all BPD prediction models developed to address the uncertainty of which model is sufficiently valid and generalisable for use in clinical practice and research.Published BPD prediction models are mostly outdated, single centre and lack external validation.Laughon’s 2011 model is the most promising but more robust models, using contemporary data with external validation are needed to support better treatments.
Citation
Kwok, T. C., Batey, N., Luu, K. L., Prayle, A., & Sharkey, D. (2023). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis with validation. Pediatric Research, 94, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02451-8
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 14, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 9, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023-07 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 10, 2023 |
Journal | Pediatric Research |
Print ISSN | 0031-3998 |
Electronic ISSN | 1530-0447 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 94 |
Pages | 43–54 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02451-8 |
Keywords | Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/15712063 |
Publisher URL | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-022-02451-8 |
Additional Information | Received: 20 September 2022; Revised: 6 December 2022; Accepted: 14 December 2022; First Online: 9 January 2023; : The authors declare no competing interests. |
Files
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction models
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Feed thickeners in gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants
(2018)
Journal Article
Airflow dispersion during common neonatal resuscitation procedures: A simulation study
(2021)
Journal Article
Application and potential of artificial intelligence in neonatal medicine
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search