Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Techniques for managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: A systematic review

Peak, Amelia GQ; Barwise, Elena; Walker, Kate F

Techniques for managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: A systematic review Thumbnail


Authors

Amelia GQ Peak

Elena Barwise

KATE WALKER Kate.Walker@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Professor



Abstract

A complication arising at caesarean birth when the baby's head is deeply engaged in the pelvis and may be difficult to deliver, is known as an ‘impacted fetal head’. This obstetric emergency occurs in 16% of second stage caesarean sections. Multiple techniques are described in the literature to manage the complication but there is no consensus regarding which technique results in the best maternal and neonatal outcomes. The objective of this review is to determine which technique for managing impacted fetal head at caesarean section has the best maternal and neonatal outcomes. A literature search of three electronic databases was conducted in November 2021. Studies directly comparing two methods for the management of impacted fetal head at caesarean section in the second stage were included. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case-control studies, and studies not fitting the search criteria were excluded. Data was extracted in Covidence and meta-analysis of the six most commonly reported outcomes was conducted using RevMan 5.4. In total, 16 studies (3344women) were included. 13 studies (2506women) compared the push method with reverse breech extraction. meta-analysis showed that risk of extension of the uterine incision, blood transfusion, bladder injury, postpartum haemorrhage, NICU admission and Apgar score <7 at 5 min were significantly higher with the push method compared with reverse breech extraction. Three studies (838women) compared the push method with Patwardhan's technique. meta-analysis of studies comparing the push method with Patwardhan's technique found no significant differences between the two groups in any of the six maternal or neonatal outcomes. Evidence derived from small, inadequately powered studies suggests reverse breech extraction is associated with better outcomes than the push method. The method which produces the best outcomes is still unknown as not all methods have been tested. Further high quality, adequately powered RCTs are warranted for definitive conclusions to be drawn and to ameliorate the paucity of evidence on how best to manage this complication.

Citation

Peak, A. G., Barwise, E., & Walker, K. F. (2023). Techniques for managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: A systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 281, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.017

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Dec 8, 2022
Online Publication Date Dec 12, 2022
Publication Date 2023-02
Deposit Date May 17, 2023
Publicly Available Date May 17, 2023
Journal European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Print ISSN 0301-2115
Electronic ISSN 1872-7654
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 281
Pages 12-22
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.017
Keywords Reverse breech extraction, Complication, Patwardhan’s technique, Impacted fetal head, Caesarean, Second stage, Push method
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/15707165
Publisher URL https://www.ejog.org/article/S0301-2115(22)00629-7/fulltext
Related Public URLs https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211522006297

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations