Inga Ulnicane
Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy
Ulnicane, Inga; Knight, William; Leach, Tonii; Stahl, Bernd Carsten; Wanjiku, Winter-Gladys
Authors
William Knight
Tonii Leach
Professor BERND STAHL Bernd.Stahl@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF CRITICAL RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY
Winter-Gladys Wanjiku
Abstract
This paper examines how the governance in AI policy documents have been framed as way to resolve public controversies surrounding AI. It draws on the studies of governance of emerging technologies, the concept of policy framing, and analysis of 49 recent policy documents dedicated to AI which have been prepared in the context of technological hype expecting fast advances of AI that will fundamentally change economy and society. The hype about AI is accompanied by major public controversy about positive and negative effects of AI. Against the backdrop of this policy controversy, governance emerges as one of the frames that diagnoses the problems and offers prescriptions. Accordingly, the current governance characterized by oligopoly of a small number of large companies is indicated as one of the reasons for problems such as lack of consideration of societal needs and concerns. To address these problems, governance frame in AI policy documents assigns more active and collaborative roles to the state and society. Amid public controversies, the state is assigned the roles of promoting and facilitating AI development while at the same time being a guarantor of risk mitigation and enabler of societal engagement. High expectations are assigned to public engagement with multiple publics as a way to increase diversity, representation and equality in AI development and use. While this governance frame might have a normative appeal, it is not specific about addressing some well-known challenges of the proposed governance mode such as risks of capture by vested interests or difficulties to achieve consensus.
Citation
Ulnicane, I., Knight, W., Leach, T., Stahl, B. C., & Wanjiku, W.-G. (2021). Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy. Policy and Society, 40(2), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 17, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 17, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jan 1, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 12, 2023 |
Print ISSN | 1449-4035 |
Electronic ISSN | 1839-3373 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 40 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 158-177 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800 |
Keywords | Political Science and International Relations; Public Administration; Sociology and Political Science |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/14601902 |
Publisher URL | https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article/40/2/158/6509326 |
Files
14494035.2020.1855800
(476 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
The Earth, Brain, Health Commission: how to preserve mental health in a changing environment
(2024)
Journal Article
A Taxonomy of Domestic Robot Failure Outcomes: Understanding the impact of failure on trustworthiness of domestic robots
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search