On the delineation of tropical vegetation types with an emphasis on forest/savanna transitions
Torello-Raventos, Mireia; Feldpausch, Ted R.; Veenendaal, Elmar; Schrodt, Franziska; Saiz, Gustavo; Domingues, Tomas F.; Djagbletey, Gloria; Ford, Andrew; Kemp, Jeanette; Marimon, Beatriz S.; Hur Marimon Junior, Ben; Lenza, Eddie; Ratter, James A.; Maracahipes, Leandro; Sasaki, Denise; Sonké, Bonaventure; Zapfack, Louis; Taedoumg, Hermann; Villarroel, Daniel; Schwarz, Michael; Quesada, Carlos A.; Yoko Ishida, F.; Nardoto, Gabriela B.; Affum-Baffoe, Kofi; Arroyo, Luzmilla; M.J.S. Bowman, David; Compaore, Halidou; Davies, Kalu; Diallo, Adama; Fyllas, Nikolaos M.; Gilpin, Martin; Hien, Fidèle; Johnson, Michelle; Killeen, Timothy J.; Metcalfe, Daniel; Miranda, Heloisa S.; Steininger, Mark; Thomson, John; Sykora, Karle; Mougin, Eric; Hiernaux, Pierre; Bird, Michael I.; Grace, John; Lewis, Simon L.; Phillips, Oliver L.; Lloyd, Jon
Ted R. Feldpausch
Dr FRANZISKA SCHRODT WILLIAMS FRANZISKA.SCHRODT1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Tomas F. Domingues
Beatriz S. Marimon
Ben Hur Marimon Junior
James A. Ratter
Carlos A. Quesada
F. Yoko Ishida
Gabriela B. Nardoto
David M.J.S. Bowman
Nikolaos M. Fyllas
Timothy J. Killeen
Heloisa S. Miranda
Michael I. Bird
Simon L. Lewis
Oliver L. Phillips
Background: There is no generally agreed classification scheme for the many different vegetation formation types occurring in the tropics. This hinders cross-continental comparisons and causes confusion as words such as ‘forest’ and ‘savanna’ have different meanings to different people. Tropical vegetation formations are therefore usually imprecisely and/or ambiguously defined in modelling, remote sensing and ecological studies.
Aims: To integrate observed variations in tropical vegetation structure and floristic composition into a single classification scheme.
Methods: Using structural and floristic measurements made on three continents, discrete tropical vegetation groupings were defined on the basis of overstorey and understorey structure and species compositions by using clustering techniques.
Results: Twelve structural groupings were identified based on height and canopy cover of the dominant upper stratum and the extent of lower-strata woody shrub cover and grass cover. Structural classifications did not, however, always agree with those based on floristic composition, especially for plots located in the forest–savanna transition zone. This duality is incorporated into a new tropical vegetation classification scheme.
Conclusions: Both floristics and stand structure are important criteria for the meaningful delineation of tropical vegetation formations, especially in the forest/savanna transition zone. A new tropical vegetation classification scheme incorporating this information has been developed.
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Mar 20, 2013|
|Journal||Plant Ecology & Diversity|
|Publisher||Taylor & Francis Open|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|APA6 Citation||Torello-Raventos, M., Feldpausch, T. R., Veenendaal, E., Schrodt, F., Saiz, G., Domingues, T. F., …Lloyd, J. (2013). On the delineation of tropical vegetation types with an emphasis on forest/savanna transitions. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 6(1), 101-137. doi:10.1080/17550874.2012.762812|
|Keywords||anopy cover, cluster analysis forest, savanna, tropics, vegetation categorisation|
You might also like
TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access
Challenges and opportunities for biogeography-What can we still learn from von Humboldt?
Leaf economics and plant hydraulics drive leaf/wood area ratios