Two steps backward and one step forward: the cautionary tale of Bank Mellat (No 1)

Sargeant, Christopher

Abstract

This paper considers the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat (No 1). It argues that whilst the initial decision to enter into a CMP was unjustified, the conditions imposed on its use will ultimately mean that the legacy of the decision will undoubtedly be more positive.

Citation

Sargeant, C. (2014). Two steps backward and one step forward: the cautionary tale of Bank Mellat (No 1). Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 3(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.01.184

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 1, 2014
• Online Publication Date: Jun 1, 2014
• Publication Date: Jun 1, 2014
• Deposit Date: Dec 12, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Aug 16, 2019
• Journal: Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law
• Print ISSN: 2050-1706
• Electronic ISSN: 2050-1714
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 111-123
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.01.184
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1409913
• Related Public URLs: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2616672
• Additional Information: DOI doesn't work. Cannot find publisher's website for article.
• Contract Date: Dec 12, 2018