Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Thinking outside of the box II: disrupting the cognitive map

Buckley, Matthew G.; Smith, Alastair D.; Haselgrove, Mark

Thinking outside of the box II: disrupting the cognitive map Thumbnail


Authors

Matthew G. Buckley

Alastair D. Smith

MARK HASELGROVE mark.haselgrove@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Experimental Psychology



Abstract

A number of influential spatial learning theories posit that organisms encode a viewpoint independent (i.e. allocentric) representation of the global boundary shape of their environment in order to support spatial reorientation and place learning. In contrast to the trial and error learning mechanisms that support domain-general processes, a representation of the global-shape of the environment is thought to be encoded automatically as part of a cognitive map, and without interference from other spatial cues. To date, however, this core theoretical assumption has not been appropriately examined. This is because previous attempts to address this question have failed to employ tasks that fully dissociate reorientation based on an allocentric representation of global-shape from egocentric reorientation strategies. Here, we address this issue in two experiments. Participants were trained to navigate to a hidden goal on one side of a virtual arena (e.g. the inside) before being required to find the same point on the alternative side (e.g. the outside). At test, performing the correct search behaviour requires an allocentric representation of the global boundary-shape. Using established associative learning procedures of overshadowing and blocking, we find that search behaviour at test is disrupted when participants were able to form landmark-goal associations during training. These results demonstrate that encoding of an allocentric representation of boundary information is susceptible to interference from landmark cues, and is not acquired through special means. Instead, the results suggest that allocentric representations of environmental boundaries are acquired through the same kind of error-correction mechanisms that support domain-general non-spatial learning.

Citation

Buckley, M. G., Smith, A. D., & Haselgrove, M. (2019). Thinking outside of the box II: disrupting the cognitive map. Cognitive Psychology, 108, 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.11.001

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 14, 2018
Online Publication Date Dec 11, 2018
Publication Date Feb 28, 2019
Deposit Date Dec 6, 2018
Publicly Available Date Dec 12, 2019
Journal Cognitive Psychology
Print ISSN 0010-0285
Electronic ISSN 1095-5623
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 108
Pages 22-41
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.11.001
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1372140
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002851830152X
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Thinking outside of the box II: Disrupting the cognitive map; Journal Title: Cognitive Psychology; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.11.001; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Contract Date Dec 6, 2018

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations