Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) or dinoprostone vaginal inserts (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour: A UK cost-consequence model

Walker, Kate F.; Zaher, Summia; Torrejon Torres, Rafael; Saunders, Sita J.; Saunders, Rhodri; Gupta, Janesh K.

Synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) or dinoprostone vaginal inserts (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour: A UK cost-consequence model Thumbnail


Authors

KATE WALKER Kate.Walker@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Professor

Summia Zaher

Rafael Torrejon Torres

Sita J. Saunders

Rhodri Saunders

Janesh K. Gupta



Abstract

To estimate the costs of synthetic osmotic dilators (Dilapan-S) compared to dinoprostone vaginal inserts (Propess) for inpatient induction of labour (IOL). A population-level, Markov model-based cost-consequence analysis was developed to compare the impact of using Dilapan-S versus Propess. The time horizon was modelled from admission to birth. The target population was women requiring inpatient IOL from 37 weeks with an unfavourable cervix in the UK. Mean population characteristics reflected those of the SOLVE (NCT03001661) trial. No patient data were included in this analysis. The care pathways and staff workload were modelled using data from the SOLVE trial and clinical experience. Cost and clinical inputs were sourced from the SOLVE trial and peer-reviewed literature. Costs were inflated to 2020 British pounds (GBP, £). Outcomes were reported as an average per woman for total costs and required staff time (minutes) from admission for IOL until birth. The model robustness was assessed using a probabilistic, multivariate sensitivity analysis of 2,000 simulations with results presented as the median (interquartile range, IQR). Dilapan-S was cost neutral compared to Propess. Midwife and obstetrician times were decreased by 146 min (-11%) and 11 min (-54%), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that in 78% of simulations, use of Dilapan-S reduced midwife time with a median of -160 min (IQR -277 to -24 min). Costs were reduced in 54% of simulations (median -£33, IQR -£319 to £282). The model indicates that adoption of Dilapan-S is likely to be cost-neutral and reduce staff workload in comparison to Propess. Results require support from real-world data and further exploration of Dilapan-S is to be encouraged. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.]

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 25, 2022
Online Publication Date Sep 16, 2022
Publication Date Nov 30, 2022
Deposit Date May 11, 2023
Publicly Available Date May 11, 2023
Journal European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Print ISSN 0301-2115
Electronic ISSN 1872-7654
Publisher Elsevier BV
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 278
Pages 72-76
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.018
Keywords Prostaglandins, Cost of care, Labour induction, Synthetic osmotic dilator, Cervical ripening, Health economics
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/12316879
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211522004833

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations