Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Insights into the influence of the cooling profile on the reconstitution times of amorphous lyophilized protein formulations

Beech, Karen E.; Biddlecombe, James G.; van der Walle, Christopher F.; Stevens, Lee A.; Rigby, Sean P.; Burley, Jonathan C.; Allen, Stephanie; Burley, Jonathan C.; Allena, Stephanie

Insights into the influence of the cooling profile on the reconstitution times of amorphous lyophilized protein formulations Thumbnail


Authors

Karen E. Beech

James G. Biddlecombe

Christopher F. van der Walle

LEE STEVENS LEE.STEVENS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow

SEAN RIGBY sean.rigby@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Chemical Engineering

Stephanie Allen

Stephanie Allena



Abstract

Lyophilized protein formulations must be reconstituted back into solution prior to patient administration and in this regard long reconstitution times are not ideal. The factors that govern reconstitution time remain poorly understood. The aim of this research was to understand the influence of the lyophilization cooling profile (including annealing) on the resulting cake structure and reconstitution time. Three protein formulations (BSA 50 mg/ml, BSA 200 mg/ml and IgG1 40 mg/ml, all in 7% w/v sucrose) were investigated after cooling at either 0.5 °C/min, or quench cooling with liquid nitrogen with/without annealing. Significantly longer reconstitution times were observed for the lower protein concentration formulations following quench cool. Porosity measurements found concomitant increases in the surface area of the porous cake structure but a reduction in total pore volume. We propose that slow reconstitution results from either closed pores or small pores impeding the penetration of water into the lyophilized cake.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 31, 2015
Online Publication Date Aug 4, 2015
Publication Date Oct 1, 2015
Deposit Date Sep 15, 2017
Publicly Available Date Feb 5, 2019
Journal European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Print ISSN 0939-6411
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 96
Pages 247-254
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.07.029
Public URL http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84940481717&partnerID=40&md5=540cf30ef596bbd30cfacaf890ae0374
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093964111500332X?via%3Dihub

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations