Taking wishes and feelings seriously: the views of people lacking capacity in Court of Protection decision-making

Munro, Nell

Abstract

The Mental Capacity Act requires that where a person (P) lacks capacity to make a decision her wishes and feelings be taken into account when deciding what is in her best interests. This article considers how the Court of Protection evaluates evidence from P concerning her wishes and feelings. It finds that the Court ignores evidence regarding current wishes and fails to engage with more ambiguous evidence where P desires conflicting outcomes or may be concealing her true feelings. This is unhelpful since it makes the resulting judgment unconvincing to observers. It is legally problematic, since the Court should be following the practices of other decision-makers under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA). And it is ethically problematic since it undermines P's dignity and does not treat P as an actor whose evidence regarding her wishes and feelings has intrinsic status which the Court must make active efforts to engage with or discount rather than ignore.

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jan 21, 2014
• Online Publication Date: Mar 5, 2014
• Publication Date: 2014
• Deposit Date: Jul 27, 2016
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 3, 2020
• Print ISSN: 0964-9069
• Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 36
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 59-75
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2014.886878
• Public URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09649069.2014.886878
• Publisher URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09649069.2014.886878