Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The Arendtian Dread: courts with power

Bassok, Or

The Arendtian Dread: courts with power Thumbnail


Authors

OR BASSOK OR.BASSOK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Assistant Professor



Abstract

Hannah Arendt was fearful not only of a populist President speaking in the name of the people and unbound by legality. She was also concerned that the popular will could be harnessed to support those responsible for limiting it. More concretely, she was fearful of the American Supreme Court relying on popular support. This is the meaning behind her obscure depiction of the American Supreme Court as “the true seat of authority in the American Republic” but as unfit to power. I argue that Arendt’s characterization of authority as requiring “neither coercion nor persuasion” means that the Court’s source of legitimacy is expertise rather than public support. Yet the current dominant understanding among American Justices as well as scholars is that public support is the source of the Court’s authority. In Arendt’s mind, such an understanding means that the Court has become the seat of power. The corruption of the Court’s authority and constitutional law as a language of expertise capable of resisting public opinion will inevitably follow. Arendt would thus be extremely concerned by the continuing erosion in understanding of the American Supreme Court as an expert, and from the rise of the understanding that its source of legitimacy lies in public confidence.

Citation

Bassok, O. (2017). The Arendtian Dread: courts with power. Ratio Juris, 30(4), 417-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12186

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 24, 2017
Online Publication Date Nov 22, 2017
Publication Date Dec 31, 2017
Deposit Date Sep 11, 2018
Publicly Available Date Nov 23, 2019
Journal Ratio Juris
Print ISSN 0952-1917
Electronic ISSN 1467-9337
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 30
Issue 4
Pages 417-432
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12186
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1070551
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/raju.12186
Additional Information This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Ratio Juris. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/raju.12186
Contract Date Sep 11, 2018

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations