Benjamin M.C. Swift
Anthropogenic environmental drivers of antimicrobial resistance in wildlife
Swift, Benjamin M.C.; Bennett, Malcolm; Waller, Katie; Dodd, Christine; Murray, Annie; Gomes, Rachel L.; Humphreys, Bethan; Hobman, Jon L.; Jones, Michael A.; Whitlock, Sophia E.; Mitchell, Lucy J.; Lennon, Rosie J.; Arnold, Kathryn E.
Authors
Professor MALCOLM BENNETT M.BENNETT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Zoonotic and Emerging Disease
Katie Waller
Christine Dodd
Annie Murray
RACHEL GOMES rachel.gomes@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Water & Resource Processing
Bethan Humphreys
JON HOBMAN jon.hobman@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
MICHAEL JONES michael.a.jones@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Sophia E. Whitlock
Lucy J. Mitchell
Rosie J. Lennon
Kathryn E. Arnold
Abstract
The isolation of antimicrobial resistant bacteria (ARB) from wildlife living adjacent to humans has led to the suggestion that such antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is anthropogenically driven by exposure to antimicrobials and ARB. However, ARB have also been detected in wildlife living in areas without interaction with humans. Here, we investigated patterns of resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from 408 wild bird and mammal faecal samples. AMR and multi-drug resistance (MDR) prevalence in wildlife samples differed significantly between a Sewage Treatment Plant (STP; wastes of antibiotic-treated humans) and a Farm site (antibiotic-treated livestock wastes) and Central site (no sources of wastes containing anthropogenic AMR or antimicrobials), but patterns of resistance also varied significantly over time and between mammals and birds. Over 30% of AMR isolates were resistant to colistin, a last-resort antibiotic, but resistance was not due to the mcr-1 gene. ESBL and AmpC activity were common in isolates from mammals. Wildlife were, therefore, harbouring resistance of clinical relevance. AMR E. coli, including MDR, were found in diverse wildlife species, and the patterns and prevalence of resistance were not consistently associated with site and therefore different exposure risks. We conclude that AMR in commensal bacteria of wildlife is not driven simply by anthropogenic factors, and, in practical terms, this may limit the utility of wildlife as sentinels of spatial variation in the transmission of environmental AMR.
Citation
Swift, B. M., Bennett, M., Waller, K., Dodd, C., Murray, A., Gomes, R. L., …Arnold, K. E. (2019). Anthropogenic environmental drivers of antimicrobial resistance in wildlife. Science of the Total Environment, 649, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.180
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 14, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 16, 2018 |
Publication Date | Feb 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Aug 30, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 17, 2019 |
Journal | Science of The Total Environment |
Print ISSN | 0048-9697 |
Electronic ISSN | 1879-1026 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 649 |
Pages | 12-20 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.180 |
Keywords | E. coli; Antimicrobial resistance; Wildlife; Birds; Multi-drug resistance; Wastewater treatment |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1052724 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969718331449 |
Files
Anthropogenic environmental drivers
(<nobr>680 Kb</nobr>)
PDF
Anthropogenic environmental drivers supplemental material
(446 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/