Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hawton, Keith; Witt, Katrina G.; Taylor Salisbury, Tatiana L.; Arensman, Ella; Gunnell, David; Hazell, Philip; Townsend, Ellen; van Heeringen, Kees

Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Thumbnail


Authors

Keith Hawton

Katrina G. Witt

Tatiana L. Taylor Salisbury

Ella Arensman

David Gunnell

Philip Hazell

Kees van Heeringen



Abstract

Background: Self-harm (intentional acts of non-fatal self-poisoning or self-injury) is common, often repeated and strongly associated with suicide. Effective aftercare of individuals who self-harm is therefore important. We have undertaken a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.
Methods: We searched five electronic databases (CCDANCTR-Studies and References, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychosocial interventions for adults following a recent (within six months) episode of self-harm. Fifty-five non-overlapping RCTs were identified. Most interventions were evaluated in single trials. We report results for interventions for which at least three RCTs comparing interventions to treatment as usual have been published and hence might contribute to clinical guidance.
Findings: Cognitive behavioural-based psychotherapy (CBT; comprising cognitive-behavioural and/or problem-solving therapy) was associated with fewer participants repeating self-harm at six (OR 0·54, 95% CI 0·34 to 0·85; 12 trials; N=1,317) and 12 months’ follow-up (OR 0·80, 95% CI 0·65 to 0·98; 10 trials; N=2,142). There were also significant improvements in depression, hopelessness and suicidal ideation. Patients receiving dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT; three trials) had fewer repeat self-harm episodes post-intervention (MD -18·80, 95% CI -36·70 – -0·95; 3 trials; N=292), however, DBT was not associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of participants engaging in self-harm. Case management and sending regular postcards (four trials each) did not reduce repetition.
Interpretation: CBT-based psychotherapy appears to be effective in patients following self-harm. DBT reduces frequency of repetition of self-harm. However, aside for CBT-based psychotherapy, there were few trials of other promising interventions, precluding firm conclusions as to their effectiveness.

Citation

Hawton, K., Witt, K. G., Taylor Salisbury, T. L., Arensman, E., Gunnell, D., Hazell, P., …van Heeringen, K. (2016). Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366%2816%2930070-0

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 20, 2016
Online Publication Date Jul 12, 2016
Publication Date Aug 1, 2016
Deposit Date Jul 5, 2016
Publicly Available Date Jul 12, 2016
Journal The Lancet Psychiatry
Electronic ISSN 2215-0366
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 3
Issue 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366%2816%2930070-0
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/797553
Publisher URL http://thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(16)30070-0/fulltext
Contract Date Jul 5, 2016

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations