A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants

Killan, Catherine F.; Hoare, Derek J.; Katiri, Roulla; Pierzycki, Robert H.; Adams, Bethany; Hartley, Douglas E. H.; Ropar, Danielle; Kitterick, Pádraig T.

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical practice regarding children’s candidature for cochlear implantation varies internationally, albeit with a recent global trend toward implanting children with more residual hearing than in the past. The provision of either hearing aids or cochlear implants can influence a wide range of children’s outcomes. However, guidance on eligibility and suitability for implantation is often based on a small number of studies and a limited range of speech perception measures. No recent reviews have catalogued what is known about comparative outcomes for children with severe hearing-loss using hearing aids to children using cochlear implants. This article describes the findings of a scoping review that addressed the question “What research has been conducted comparing cochlear implant outcomes to outcomes in children using hearing aids with severe hearing-loss in the better-hearing ear?” The first objective was to catalogue the characteristics of studies pertinent to these children’s candidature for cochlear implantation, to inform families, clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. The second objective was to identify gaps in the evidence base, to inform future research projects and identify opportunities for evidence synthesis. Design: We included studies comparing separate groups of children using hearing aids to those using cochlear implants and also repeated measures studies comparing outcomes of children with severe hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation. We included any outcomes that might feasibly be influenced by the provision of hearing aids or cochlear implants. We searched the electronic databases Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL, for peer-reviewed journal articles with full-texts written in English, published from July 2007 to October 2019. The scoping methodology followed the approach recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute regarding study selection, data extraction, and data presentation. Results: Twenty-one eligible studies were identified, conducted across 11 countries. The majority of children studied had either congenital or prelingual hearing loss, with typical cognitive function, experience of spoken language, and most implanted children used one implant. Speech and language development and speech perception were the most frequently assessed outcomes. However, some aspects of these outcomes were sparsely represented including voice, communication and pragmatic skills, and speech perception in complex background noise. Two studies compared literacy, two sound localization, one quality of life, and one psychosocial outcomes. None compared educational attainment, listening fatigue, balance, tinnitus, or music perception. Conclusions: This scoping review provides a summary of the literature regarding comparative outcomes of children with severe hearing-loss using acoustic hearing aids and children using cochlear implants. Notable gaps in knowledge that could be addressed in future research includes children’s quality of life, educational attainment, and complex listening and language outcomes, such as word and sentence understanding in background noise, spatial listening, communication and pragmatic skills. Clinician awareness of this sparse evidence base is important when making management decisions for children with more residual hearing than traditional implant candidates. This review also provides direction for researchers wishing to strengthen the evidence base upon which clinical decisions can be made.

Citation

Killan, C. F., Hoare, D. J., Katiri, R., Pierzycki, R. H., Adams, B., Hartley, D. E. H., …Kitterick, P. T. (2021). A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing, 43(2), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001104

• Journal Article Type: Review
• Acceptance Date: Jun 4, 2021
• Online Publication Date: Aug 3, 2021
• Publication Date: Aug 3, 2021
• Deposit Date: Aug 27, 2021
• Publicly Available Date: Aug 4, 2022
• Journal: Ear and Hearing
• Print ISSN: 0196-0202
• Electronic ISSN: 1538-4667
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 43
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 290-304
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001104
• Keywords: Speech and Hearing, Otorhinolaryngology
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6012521
• Publisher URL: https://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Abstract/9000/A_Scoping_Review_of_Studies_Comparing_Outcomes_for.98454.aspx