Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries

Kettlewell, Jade; das Nair, Roshan; Radford, Kate

A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries Thumbnail


Authors

ROSHAN NAIR Roshan.dasnair@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology



Contributors

Patricia Dziunka
Other

Abstract

Objective:
This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of personal smart technologies on outcomes in adults with acquired brain injury.

Data sources:
A systematic literature search was conducted on 30 May 2019. Twelve electronic databases, grey literature databases, PROSPERO, reference list and author citations were searched.

Methods:
Randomised controlled trials were included if personal smart technology was used to improve independence, goal attainment/function, fatigue or quality of life in adults with acquired brain injury. Data were extracted using a bespoke form and the TIDieR checklist. Studies were graded using the PEDro scale to assess quality of reporting. Meta-analysis was conducted across four studies.

Results:
Six studies met the inclusion criteria, generating a total of 244 participants. All studies were of high quality (PEDro ⩾ 6). Interventions included personal digital assistant, smartphone app, mobile phone messaging, Neuropage and an iPad. Reporting of intervention tailoring for individual needs was inconsistent. All studies measured goal attainment/function but none measured independence or fatigue. One study (n = 42) reported a significant increase in memory-specific goal attainment (p = 0.0001) and retrospective memory function (p = 0.042) in favour of the intervention. Another study (n = 8) reported a significant increase in social participation in favour of the intervention (p = 0.01). However, our meta-analyses found no significant effect of personal smart technology on goal attainment, cognitive or psychological function.

Conclusion:
At present, there is insufficient evidence to support the clinical benefit of personal smart technologies to improve outcomes in acquired brain injury. Researchers need to conduct more randomised studies to evaluate these interventions and measure their potential effects/harms.

Citation

Kettlewell, J., das Nair, R., & Radford, K. (2019). A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(11), 1705-1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519865774

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 4, 2019
Online Publication Date Jul 29, 2019
Publication Date Nov 1, 2019
Deposit Date Jul 29, 2019
Publicly Available Date Aug 5, 2019
Journal Clinical Rehabilitation
Print ISSN 0269-2155
Electronic ISSN 1477-0873
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 11
Pages 1705-1712
Edition Clinical Rehabilitation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519865774
Keywords Brain injury, systematic review, activities of daily living, stroke, assistive electronic technologies
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2350924
Publisher URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269215519865774
Additional Information Special Issue on Stroke
Contract Date Jul 29, 2019

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations