Rebecca Toney
Mechanisms of action and outcomes for students in Recovery Colleges
Toney, Rebecca; Elton, Daniel; Munday, Emma; Hamill, Kate; Crowther, Adam; Meddings, Sara; Taylor, Anna; Henderson, Claire; Jennings, Helen; Waring, Justin; Pollock, Kristian; Bates, Peter; Slade, Mike
Authors
Daniel Elton
Emma Munday
Kate Hamill
Adam Crowther
Sara Meddings
Anna Taylor
Claire Henderson
Helen Jennings
Justin Waring
Kristian Pollock
Peter Bates
MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion
Abstract
Objective
Recovery Colleges are widespread, with little empirical research on how they work and outcomes they produce. This study aimed to co-produce a change model characterising mechanisms of action and outcomes for mental health service users attending as students at a Recovery College.
Methods
A systematised review identified all Recovery College publications. Inductive collaborative data analysis by academic researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of ten key papers informed a theoretical framework for mechanisms and outcome for students, which was refined through deductive analysis of 34 further publications. A change model was co-produced and then refined through stakeholder interviews (n=33).
Results
Three mechanisms of action for Recovery College students were identified: empowering environment (safety, respect, supporting choices), enabling different relationships (power, peers, working together) and facilitating personal growth (e.g. co-produced learning, strengths, celebrating success). Outcomes were change in the student (e.g. self-understanding, self-confidence) and changes in the student’s life (e.g. occupational, social, service use). A co-produced change model mapping mechanisms of action to outcomes was created.
Conclusions
The key features identified as differentiating Recovery Colleges from traditional services are an empowering environment, enabling relationships and growth orientation. Recovery Colleges may benefit most attenders, but mental health service users to particularly encourage to enrol may include those who lack confidence, those who services struggle to engage with, those who will benefit from exposure to peer role models, and those lacking social capital. The change model provides the first testable characterisation of mechanisms and outcomes, allowing formal evaluation of Recovery Colleges.
Citation
Toney, R., Elton, D., Munday, E., Hamill, K., Crowther, A., Meddings, S., …Slade, M. (2018). Mechanisms of action and outcomes for students in Recovery Colleges. Psychiatric Services, 69(12), 1222-1229. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800283
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 27, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 17, 2018 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Aug 7, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 18, 2019 |
Journal | Psychiatric Services |
Print ISSN | 1075-2730 |
Electronic ISSN | 1557-9700 |
Publisher | Psychiatry Online |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 69 |
Issue | 12 |
Pages | 1222-1229 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800283 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/960371 |
Publisher URL | https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.201800283 |
Additional Information | The official published article is available online at https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.201800283 |
Contract Date | Aug 7, 2018 |
Files
Mechanisms of action and outcomes for students in recovery colleges
(365 Kb)
PDF
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search