MATTHEW DUNCOMBE matthew.duncombe@nottingham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Diodorus Cronus on Present and Past Change
Duncombe, Matthew
Authors
Abstract
Diodorus Cronus reportedly denied that there are truths about present kinēsis (change or movement) but affirmed that there are truths about past kinēsis. Although scholars have argued that Diodorus’s atomism about bodies, place, and time supports his rejection of present spatial movement of simple bodies, I argue that Diodorus rejected a broader range of present changes, including qualitative and existential change. I also argue that Diodorus rejected these three sorts of change not only for simples but also for complexes. Furthermore, philosophers since antiquity have claimed that denying truths about present change is incompatible with accepting truths about past change, since each past truth about change corresponds to some present truth about change. I argue that this objection can be overcome. I conclude that Diodorus’s arguments against present change are both broader and more successful than is usually maintained.
Citation
Duncombe, M. (2023). Diodorus Cronus on Present and Past Change. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 61(2), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0017
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 13, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 21, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023-04 |
Deposit Date | Nov 3, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 21, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of the History of Philosophy |
Print ISSN | 0022-5053 |
Electronic ISSN | 1538-4586 |
Publisher | Johns Hopkins University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 61 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 167-192 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0017 |
Keywords | Diodorus Cronus, change, atomism, past, present, truth |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6609344 |
Publisher URL | https://muse.jhu.edu/article/889846 |
Additional Information | Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press |
Files
Diodorus Cronus Atomism Change JHP Style 2021-11-03
(469 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Thought as internal speech in Plato and Aristotle
(2016)
Journal Article
Aristotle’s two accounts of relatives in Categories 7
(2015)
Journal Article
Irreflexivity and Aristotle’s syllogismos
(2014)
Journal Article
Aristotle's Categories 7 adopts Plato's view of relativity
(2018)
Book Chapter
The Role of Relatives in Plato’s Partition Argument, Republic 4, 436 B 9–439 C 9
(2015)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search