Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

An online survey of equestrian headcollar use and safety

Marlin, D. J.; Williams, J. M.; Pickles, K. J.

An online survey of equestrian headcollar use and safety Thumbnail


Authors

D. J. Marlin

J. M. Williams

K. J. Pickles



Abstract

Background: Headcollars (halters, US) are one of the most commonly used pieces of equestrian ‘tack’. Despite this, there appears to be minimal information on their use, or more importantly, risk factors for injury of horses/handlers. Objective: To explore headcollar use and safety in equestrians. Study design: Quantitative cross-sectional survey. Methods: An online survey (19 questions) exploring headcollar use and safety was disseminated through equestrian social media. Frequency analysis and multivariable modelling identified how headcollar type was linked to use and injury risk. Results: Most respondents (88%; n=4786) used headcollars multiple times daily but for short time periods (66%, n=3388, <30min). A horse being injured as a result of wearing a headcollar was reported by 1615 (31%) respondents with 15% of incidents also injuring a person. Fractures (horses) occurred in 134 incidents, and 167 equine fatalities were reported. Across all headcollar types, the odds of injury risk increased by 1.7 times (confidence intervals (CI): 1.07–2.41, P<0.02) using a headcollar when mucking out. During travelling, headcollar use reduced the odds of risk of injury by 0.7 times (CI: 0.43–0.98, P<0.04). The odds of injury risk reduced when using leather (Odds ratio (OR): 0.8, CI: 0.66–0.96, P<0.01) or synthetic (OR: 0.8, CI: 0.58–0.85, P<0.0001) safety headcollars compared with standard headcollars of the same material. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: (1) need for increased education: fit, safety features and basic horse handling, (2) ‘safer’ leather headcollars, and (3) increased safety focus required. Main limitations: Data were self-reported and may be subject to memory recall errors; online surveys are subject to self-selection bias. Conclusions: Increased user knowledge of risk factors for headcollar injury, combined with standardised guidance on how to correctly fit and use headcollars, would be beneficial to reduce injury risk.

Citation

Marlin, D. J., Williams, J. M., & Pickles, K. J. (2021). An online survey of equestrian headcollar use and safety. Equine Veterinary Education, 34(7), e299-e307. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13480

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 24, 2021
Online Publication Date May 3, 2021
Publication Date May 3, 2021
Deposit Date May 26, 2021
Publicly Available Date May 26, 2021
Journal Equine Veterinary Education
Print ISSN 0957-7734
Electronic ISSN 2042-3292
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 34
Issue 7
Pages e299-e307
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13480
Keywords Equine
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5573724
Publisher URL https://beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eve.13480

Files





Downloadable Citations