Professor KATHARINE ADENEY KATHARINE.ADENEY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Comparative Politics
How Pakistan and China Negotiate
Adeney, Katharine; Boni, Filippo
Authors
Filippo Boni
Abstract
Since being officially launched in April 2015, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has been one of the most watched set of projects under the aegis of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Having already injected around $25 billion into Pakistan, the CPEC not only has been dubbed the “flagship project” of the BRI, but it also holds a central role in Beijing’s global ambitions.
While much has been said about the geopolitical implications of the CPEC, including for both India and the United States, less attention has been devoted to providing in-depth insights into the mechanics of how the BRI is unfolding on the ground in Pakistan. How do China and Pakistan negotiate the terms of CPEC deals? To what extent has Islamabad managed to exert agency in its dealings with Beijing? How does China adapt to the contexts it operates in? By now, the CPEC has been subject to much media, academic, and policy scrutiny, but these questions have not been answered.
The power asymmetry between the two partners—coupled with the impression that the BRI represents a unidirectional Chinese endeavor, not just in Pakistan but also globally—has contributed to the erroneous representation that Beijing is merely imposing the CPEC on its all-weather partners in Islamabad. On the contrary, this study highlights China’s adaptive strategies in dealing with a host of Pakistani actors (including political parties, local communities, and the military) against the backdrop of Pakistan’s evolving political landscape and change in leadership following the country’s 2018 elections.
In filling this gap, this paper foregrounds the importance of adopting a relational approach to studying how the BRI unfolds on the ground. This entails looking at how Pakistan and China have negotiated the CPEC’s energy, infrastructure, and industrial cooperation projects. The analysis is based on semi-structured elite interviews conducted by the two authors during three rounds of fieldwork in 2015, 2018, and 2020–2021 triangulated with a host of official reports, statements, and newspaper articles.
Examining the domestic contours of the CPEC shows that Pakistani actors have wielded agency in important ways throughout the process, while Chinese actors at times have accommodated key Pakistani demands.
Citation
Adeney, K., & Boni, F. (2021). How Pakistan and China Negotiate. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment of International Peace
Report Type | Research Report |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 21, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | May 24, 2021 |
Publication Date | May 24, 2021 |
Deposit Date | May 24, 2021 |
Pages | 1-34 |
Keywords | China Pakistan Economic Corridor |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5570427 |
Publisher URL | https://carnegieendowment.org/publications/84592 |
You might also like
A move to majoritarian nationalism?: challenges of representation in South Asia
(2015)
Journal Article
How to understand Pakistan’s hybrid regime: the importance of a multidimensional continuum
(2015)
Journal Article
Does ethnofederalism explain the success of Indian federalism?
(2017)
Journal Article
Current challenges to multinational federalism in India
(2018)
Journal Article
Introduction: The Future of Democracy
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search