There is no reason to replace the Razor with the Laser

Thunder, Simon

Abstract

In recent times it has become common to encounter philosophers who recommend the replacement of one principle concerning theory choice, Ockham’s Razor, with another: the Laser. Whilst the Razor tells us not to multiply entities beyond necessity, the Laser tells us only to avoid multiplying fundamental entities beyond necessity. There appear to be seven arguments in the literature for the Laser. They divide into three categories: arguments from the nature of non-fundamentality attempt to motivate the Laser by appeal to various observations about what it is to be non-fundamental; arguments from cases describe hypothetical or actual cases, and allege that only the Laser accords with our intuitive judgements about them; and arguments from analogy claim that ontological parsimony is analogous to conceptual economy, and that this analogy recommends the Laser. I provide novel responses to each of the extant arguments for the Laser, and conclude that there is currently no good reason for replacing the Razor with the Laser.

Citation

Thunder, S. (2021). There is no reason to replace the Razor with the Laser. Synthese, 199(3-4), 7265-7282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03113-8

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 5, 2021
• Online Publication Date: Mar 29, 2021
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Deposit Date: Mar 29, 2021
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 29, 2021
• Journal: Synthese
• Print ISSN: 0039-7857
• Electronic ISSN: 1573-0964
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 199
• Issue: 3-4
• Pages: 7265-7282
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03113-8
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5422652
• Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-021-03113-8