Affect enhances object-background associations: evidence from behaviour and mathematical modelling

Madan, Christopher R; Knight, Aubrey; Kensinger, Elizabeth; Mickley Steinmetz, Katherine

Abstract

In recognition memory paradigms, emotional details are often recognised better than neutral ones, but at the cost of memory for peripheral details. We previously provided evidence that, when peripheral details must be recalled using central details as cues, peripheral details from emotional scenes are at least as likely to be recalled as those from neutral scenes. Here we replicated and explicated this result by implementing a mathematical modelling approach to disambiguate the influence of target type, scene emotionality, scene valence, and their interactions. After incidentally encoding scenes that included neutral backgrounds with a positive, negative, or neutral foreground objects, participants showed equal or better cued recall of components from emotional scenes compared to neutral scenes. There was no evidence of emotion-based impairment in cued recall in either of two experiments, including one in which we replicated the emotion-induced memory trade-off in recognition. Mathematical model fits indicated that the emotionality of the encoded scene was the primary driver of improved cued-recall performance. Thus, even when emotion impairs recognition of peripheral components of scenes, it can preserve the ability to recall which scene components were studied together.

Citation

Madan, C. R., Knight, A., Kensinger, E., & Mickley Steinmetz, K. (2020). Affect enhances object-background associations: evidence from behaviour and mathematical modelling. Cognition and Emotion, 34(5), 960-969. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1710110

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Dec 19, 2019
• Online Publication Date: Feb 16, 2020
• Publication Date: 2020
• Deposit Date: Jan 31, 2020
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 17, 2021
• Journal: Cognition and Emotion
• Print ISSN: 0269-9931
• Electronic ISSN: 1464-0600
• Publisher: Routledge
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 34
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 960-969
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1710110
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3637717
• Publisher URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699931.2019.1710110
• Additional Information: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion on 16/02/2020, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699931.2019.1710110