Lyndsay Alexander
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources
Alexander, Lyndsay; Cooper, Kay; Peters, Micah DJ; Tricco, Andrea C; Khalil, Hanan; Evans, Catrin; Munn, Zachary; Pieper, Dawid; Godfrey, Christina M; McInerney, Patricia; Pollock, Danielle
Authors
Kay Cooper
Micah DJ Peters
Andrea C Tricco
Hanan Khalil
Dr CATRIN EVANS CATRIN.EVANS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Evidence Based Healthcare
Zachary Munn
Dawid Pieper
Christina M Godfrey
Patricia McInerney
Danielle Pollock
Abstract
Scoping reviews can identify a large number of evidence sources. This commentary describes and provides guidance on planning, conducting, and reporting large scoping reviews. This guidance is informed by experts in scoping review methodology, including JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review Methodology group members, who have also conducted and reported large scoping reviews. We propose a working definition for large scoping reviews that includes approximately 100 sources of evidence but must also consider the volume of data to be extracted, the complexity of the analyses, and purpose. We pose 6 core questions for scoping review authors to consider when planning, developing, conducting, and reporting large scoping reviews. By considering and addressing these questions, scoping review authors might better streamline and manage the conduct and reporting of large scoping reviews from the planning to publishing stage.
Citation
Alexander, L., Cooper, K., Peters, M. D., Tricco, A. C., Khalil, H., Evans, C., …Pollock, D. (2024). Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 170, Article 111343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111343
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 27, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 4, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024-06 |
Deposit Date | Apr 11, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 11, 2024 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Print ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-5921 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 170 |
Article Number | 111343 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111343 |
Keywords | Scoping review, Evidence synthesis, guidance, methodology |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/33562438 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624000982 |
Files
1-s2.0-S0895435624000982-main
(185 Kb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews
(2024)
Journal Article
How Can Digital Consultations Best Be Used In Maternity Care?
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search