Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Infliximab induction regimens in steroid refractory acute severe colitis: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis

Sebastian, S.; Myers, S.; Argyriou, K.; Martin, G.; Los, L.; Fiske, J.; Ranjan, R.; Cooper, B.; Goodoory, V.; Ching, H.L.; Jayasooriya, N.; Brooks, J.; Dhar, A.; Shenoy, A.H.; Limdi, J.K.; Butterworth, J.; Allen, P.B.; Samuel, S.; Moran, G.W.; Shenderey, R.; Parkes, G.; Lobo, A.; Kennedy, N.A.; Subramanian, S.; Raine, T.

Authors

S. Sebastian

S. Myers

K. Argyriou

G. Martin

L. Los

J. Fiske

R. Ranjan

B. Cooper

V. Goodoory

H.L. Ching

N. Jayasooriya

J. Brooks

A. Dhar

A.H. Shenoy

J.K. Limdi

J. Butterworth

P.B. Allen

S. Samuel

GORDON MORAN GORDON.MORAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Gastroenterology

R. Shenderey

G. Parkes

A. Lobo

N.A. Kennedy

S. Subramanian

T. Raine



Abstract

Background:
Accelerated induction regimens of infliximab have been proposed to improve response rates in patients with steroid refractory acute severe colitis.

Aims:
We aimed to determine differences in outcome for acute severe ulcerative colitis between accelerated and standard-dose infliximab.

Methods:
We collected data on hospitalised patients receiving differing regimens of rescue therapy for steroid refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Our primary outcome was 30-day colectomy rate. Secondary outcomes were colectomy within index admission, 90 days and 12 months. We used propensity score analysis with optimal calliper matching using a priori defined high-risk covariates to reduce potential provider selection bias.

Results:
We included 131 patients receiving infliximab rescue therapy; 102 patients received standard induction and 29 received accelerated induction. In the unmatched cohort, there was no difference by type of induction in 30-day colectomy rates (18% vs. 20%, p=0.45), colectomy during index admission (13% vs. 20%, p = 0.26) or overall colectomy (20% vs. 24%, p= 0.38).

In the propensity score-matched cohort of 52 patients, 30-day colectomy (57% vs. 27%, p = 0.048) and index admission colectomy (53% vs. 23%,p =0.045) rates were higher in those receiving standard induction compared to accelerated induction but there was no difference in overall colectomy rates between the 2 groups (57% vs. 31%, p =0.09). There was no significant difference in length of stay or in complication and infection rates.

Conclusion:
In a propensity score matched cohort, steroid refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis patients, short-term, but not long-term, colectomy rates appear to be lower in those receiving accelerated induction regimen.

Citation

Sebastian, S., Myers, S., Argyriou, K., Martin, G., Los, L., Fiske, J., …Raine, T. (2019). Infliximab induction regimens in steroid refractory acute severe colitis: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 50(6), 675-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15456

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 19, 2019
Online Publication Date Aug 27, 2019
Publication Date 2019-09
Deposit Date Aug 1, 2019
Publicly Available Date Aug 28, 2020
Journal Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Print ISSN 0269-2813
Electronic ISSN 1365-2036
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 50
Issue 6
Pages 675-683
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15456
Keywords Acute severe colitis, Rescue therapy, Accelerated induction, Standard Induction, Colectomy
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2368736
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/apt.15456
Additional Information This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sebastian, S, Myers, S, Argyriou, K, et al. Infliximab induction regimens in steroid‐refractory acute severe colitis: a multicentre retrospective cohort study with propensity score analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 50: 675– 683, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15456. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations