Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cost‐utility analysis of deep brain stimulation surgery plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy in patients with Parkinson's: Economic evaluation alongside the PD SURG trial

McIntosh, Emma; Gray, Alastair; Daniels, Jane; Gill, Steven; Ives, Natalie; Jenkinson, Crispin; Mitchell, Rosalind; Pall, Hardev; Patel, Smitaa; Quinn, Niall; Rick, Caroline; Wheatley, Keith; Williams, Adrian; on behalf of The PD SURG Collaborators Group

Authors

Emma McIntosh

Alastair Gray

Steven Gill

Natalie Ives

Crispin Jenkinson

Rosalind Mitchell

Hardev Pall

Smitaa Patel

Niall Quinn

Keith Wheatley

Adrian Williams

on behalf of The PD SURG Collaborators Group



Abstract

Introduction

Williams and colleagues reported that DBS surgery for patients with advanced PD improves motor function and quality of life compared to best medical therapy alone at 1 year, but with surgery‐related side effects in a minority. This article reports on the economic evaluation alongside this trial.

Methods

Detailed resource use and quality of life over 12 months after randomization was obtained from the trial reported by Williams and colleagues. Outcomes were measured using the EQ‐5D and quality‐adjusted life years calculated.

Results

Year 1 costs for surgery were significantly higher than in best medical therapy, at £19,069 compared to £9,813, a difference of £9,256 (95% confidence interval [CI]: £7,625, £10,887). There was a small, significant gain in utility at 1 year but a statistically insignificant gain of 0.02 quality‐adjusted life years (95% CI: −0.015, 0.05) in the surgical arm. The incremental cost per quality‐adjusted life year of surgery at 1 year was £468,528. Extrapolation reveals that after 5 years, this ratio is likely to reduce to £45,180, but subsequently rise to £70,537 at 10 years owing to the increased probability of battery replacements (and re‐replacements) beyond 5 years.

Conclusion

In this patient group, DBS is not cost‐effective at 1 year. Extrapolation, however, reveals an increasing likelihood of cost‐effectiveness up to 5 years and reducing cost‐effectiveness between 5 and 10 years. These models are sensitive to assumptions about future costs and quality‐adjusted life years gained.

Citation

McIntosh, E., Gray, A., Daniels, J., Gill, S., Ives, N., Jenkinson, C., …on behalf of The PD SURG Collaborators Group. (2016). Cost‐utility analysis of deep brain stimulation surgery plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy in patients with Parkinson's: Economic evaluation alongside the PD SURG trial. Movement Disorders, 31(8), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26423

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 13, 2015
Online Publication Date Feb 5, 2016
Publication Date 2016-08
Deposit Date Jun 27, 2019
Journal Movement Disorders
Print ISSN 0885-3185
Electronic ISSN 1531-8257
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 31
Issue 8
Pages 1173-1182
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26423
Keywords Neurology; Clinical Neurology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2235534
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mds.26423
Additional Information This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: McIntosh, E. , Gray, A. , Daniels, J. , Gill, S. , Ives, N. , Jenkinson, C. , Mitchell, R. , Pall, H. , Patel, S. , Quinn, N. , Rick, C. , Wheatley, K. , Williams, A ... (2016), Cost‐utility analysis of deep brain stimulation surgery plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy in patients with Parkinson's: Economic evaluation alongside the PD SURG trial. Mov Disord., 31: 1173-1182. doi:10.1002/mds.26423 which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26423. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.