Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparison of the effectiveness of exclusively facilitated clinical teaching as an alternative to traditional practice-based primary care placements

Tyrrell, Edward G; Knox, Richard; Saha, Runa; Berry, Kathryn; Taggar, Jaspal S

Comparison of the effectiveness of exclusively facilitated clinical teaching as an alternative to traditional practice-based primary care placements Thumbnail


Authors

Richard Knox

RUNA SAHA RUNA.SAHA@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Clinical Teaching Fellow and Community Clinical Subdean

Kathryn Berry

Dr JASPAL TAGGAR JASPAL.TAGGAR@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Primary Care and Medical Education



Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 presented major challenges to undergraduate GP placement capacity and there was an increased reliance on clinical training using facilitated simulation. The authors present a novel comparison of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of delivering a one-week primary care course using entirely GP-facilitated clinical teaching outside the GP setting against traditional practice-based GP clinical education. Methods: A one-week GP placement was redeveloped from a traditional teaching model (TT-M) to an exclusively facilitated teaching model (FT-M) delivered outside the GP practice setting, using principles of blended learning, flipped classroom methods, e-learning and simulation. Both teaching models, delivered in different locations during 2022 to pre-clinical students, were evaluated using student feedback surveys for attainment of learning outcomes and course satisfaction. Results: The students reported their consultation skills and clinical knowledge (amalgamated mean score 4.36 for FT-M versus 4.63 for TT-M; P = 0.05), as well as preparation for the clinical phases (mean scores 4.35 for FT-M versus 4.41 for TT-M; P = 0.68), were well developed and similar for both courses. Students reported similar enjoyment across both teaching models (FT-M mean score 4.31 versus 4.41 for TT-M; P = 0.49). The costs for delivering teaching per 4-h session for 100 students were £1,379 and £5,551 for FT-M and TT-M, respectively. Conclusion: Delivery of a one-week primary care attachment to third year medical students using an FT-M was similarly effective and more cost effective than delivering it by a TT-M. FT-M potentially offers an important adjunct to clinical learning and resilience to capacity challenges for GP placements.

Citation

Tyrrell, E. G., Knox, R., Saha, R., Berry, K., & Taggar, J. S. (2023). Comparison of the effectiveness of exclusively facilitated clinical teaching as an alternative to traditional practice-based primary care placements. Education for Primary Care, 34(3), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2217795

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 22, 2023
Online Publication Date Jun 6, 2023
Publication Date Jun 6, 2023
Deposit Date May 25, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jun 8, 2023
Journal Education for Primary Care
Print ISSN 1473-9879
Electronic ISSN 1475-990X
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 34
Issue 3
Pages 152-160
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2023.2217795
Keywords primary care education, medical education, facilitated teaching, clinical teaching, undergraduate teaching
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/21107924
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14739879.2023.2217795

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations