C Liu
Comparison of AR and physical experiential learning environment in supporting product innovation
Liu, C; Lu, J; Kao, Y; Chung, L; Tan, Kim
Authors
J Lu
Y Kao
L Chung
KIM TAN kim.tan@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Operations and Innovation Management
Abstract
This article compares how virtual and physical learning aids enhance learners’ product innovation capability, i.e., design experiences and domain knowledge. The virtual aid utilises augmented reality (AR) allowing learners to experience a range of animated mechanisms using smart devices. The legacy physical aid mechanisms were made using 3D printers. We studied the effects both manipulatives on learners’ understanding of mechanical movements e.g., rack and pinion, and Geneva mechanism. To investigate learning impact of each aid, we compared the experimental results derived from two learners groups (thirteen participants each). This study provides a case to support product innovation education under an experiential learning environment. The outcomes showed that both aids were useful in enhancing design experiences and domain knowledge. Pre-and-post attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction (ARCS) motivation of both aids were found to be similar. However, distinctive differences were observed in term of divergent search for ideation, suggesting for further research in combining both aids. We also found that learners’ learning motivation is lower in AR-based aid.
Citation
Liu, C., Lu, J., Kao, Y., Chung, L., & Tan, K. (2019). Comparison of AR and physical experiential learning environment in supporting product innovation. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019839578
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 28, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 15, 2019 |
Publication Date | Apr 15, 2019 |
Deposit Date | May 15, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 29, 2024 |
Journal | International Journal of Engineering Business Management |
Electronic ISSN | 1847-9790 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019839578 |
Keywords | experiential learning theory, AR-based aid, legacy physical aid, design innovations, intelligent learning environment |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2056224 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1847979019839578 |
Files
Comparison of AR and physical experiential learning environment in supporting product innovation
(371 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
The viewer value co-creation process on sports live streaming platforms
(2023)
Journal Article
Guest editorial: Digital transformation strategy and impacts during emergency situations
(2023)
Journal Article
Value Co-creation in Sports Live Streaming Platforms: A Microfoundations Perspective
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: digital-library-support@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search