Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Barriers to a software reminder system for risk assessment of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised trial in general practice

Holt, Tim A.; Dalton, Andrew R.H.; Kirkpatrick, Susan; Hislop, Jenny; Marshall, Tom; Fay, Matthew; Qureshi, Nadeem; Lasserson, Daniel S.; Kearley, Karen; Mollison, Jill; Yu, Ly-Mee; Fitzmaurice, David; Hobbs, F.D. Richard

Authors

Tim A. Holt

Andrew R.H. Dalton

Susan Kirkpatrick

Jenny Hislop

Tom Marshall

Matthew Fay

Daniel S. Lasserson

Karen Kearley

Jill Mollison

Ly-Mee Yu

David Fitzmaurice

F.D. Richard Hobbs



Abstract

Background: Oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but are underused. AURAS-AF (AUtomated Risk Assessment for Stroke in AF) is a software tool designed to identify eligible patients and promote discussions within consultations about initiating anticoagulants.

Aim: To investigate the implementation of the software in UK general practice.

Design and setting: Process evaluation involving 23 practices randomly allocated to use AURAS-AF during a cluster randomised trial.

Method: An initial invitation to discuss anticoagulation was followed by screen reminders appearing during consultations until a decision had been made. The reminders required responses, giving reasons for cases where an anticoagulant was not initiated. Qualitative interviews with clinicians and patients explored acceptability and usability.

Results: In a sample of 476 patients eligible for the invitation letter, only 159 (33.4%) were considered suitable for invitation by their GPs. Reasons given were frequently based on frailty, and risk of falls or haemorrhage. Of those invited, 35 (22%) started an anticoagulant (7.4% of those originally identified). A total of 1695 main-screen reminders occurred in 940 patients. In 883 instances, the decision was taken not to initiate and a range of reasons offered. Interviews with 15 patients and seven clinicians indicated that the intervention was acceptable, though the issue of disruptive screen reminders was raised.

Conclusion: Automated risk assessment for stroke in atrial fibrillation and prompting during consultations are feasible and generally acceptable, but did not overcome concerns about frailty and risk of haemorrhage as barriers to anticoagulant uptake.

Citation

Holt, T. A., Dalton, A. R., Kirkpatrick, S., Hislop, J., Marshall, T., Fay, M., …Hobbs, F. R. (2018). Barriers to a software reminder system for risk assessment of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised trial in general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 68(677), e844-e851. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18x699809

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 29, 2018
Online Publication Date Nov 5, 2018
Publication Date 2018-12
Deposit Date May 8, 2019
Publicly Available Date Nov 6, 2019
Journal British Journal of General Practice
Print ISSN 0960-1643
Electronic ISSN 1478-5242
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 68
Issue 677
Pages e844-e851
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18x699809
Keywords Family Practice
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2030421
Publisher URL https://bjgp.org/content/68/677/e844