Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Modelling damage and failure in adhesive joints using a combined XFEM-cohesive element methodology

Mubashar, A.; Ashcroft, I.A.; Crocombe, A. D.

Authors

A. Mubashar

IAN ASHCROFT IAN.ASHCROFT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mechanics of Solids

A. D. Crocombe



Abstract

In recent years, cohesive elements based on the cohesive zone model (CZM) have been increasingly used within finite element analyses of adhesively bonded joints to predict failure. The cohesive element approach has advantages over fracture mechanics methods in that an initial crack does not have to be incorporated within the model. It is also capable of modelling crack propagation and representing material damage in a process zone ahead of the crack tip. However, the cohesive element approach requires the placement of special elements along the crack path and is, hence, less suited to situations where the exact crack path is not known a priori. The extended finite element method (XFEM) can be used to represent cracking within a finite element and hence removes the requirement to define crack paths or have an initial crack in the structure. In this article, a hybrid XFEM-cohesive element approach is used to model cracking in the fillet area using XFEM where the crack path is not known and then using cohesive elements to model crack and damage progression along the interface. The approach is applied to the case of an aluminium–epoxy single lap joint and is shown to be highly effective.

Citation

Mubashar, A., Ashcroft, I., & Crocombe, A. D. (2014). Modelling damage and failure in adhesive joints using a combined XFEM-cohesive element methodology. Journal of Adhesion, 90(8), 682-697. doi:10.1080/00218464.2013.826580

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 16, 2013
Online Publication Date Apr 8, 2014
Publication Date Aug 3, 2014
Deposit Date Jun 29, 2018
Journal The Journal of Adhesion
Print ISSN 0021-8464
Electronic ISSN 1545-5823
Publisher Taylor & Francis Open
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 90
Issue 8
Pages 682-697
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2013.826580
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1098006
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00218464.2013.826580