Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Screening for atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in primary care

Taggar, Jaspal; Coleman, Tim; Lewis, Sarah; Jones, Matthew

Screening for atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in primary care Thumbnail


Authors

Dr JASPAL TAGGAR JASPAL.TAGGAR@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Primary Care and Medical Education

TIM COLEMAN tim.coleman@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Primary Care

Dr MATTHEW JONES MATTHEW.JONES3@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Assistant Professor in Health Economics



Abstract

Introduction:
Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting.

Methods:
A cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis.

Results:
At least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8–20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7–55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0–59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9–63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator.

Conclusion:
Inner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care.

Citation

Taggar, J., Coleman, T., Lewis, S., & Jones, M. (2016). Screening for atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in primary care. PLoS ONE, 11(4), Article e0152086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152086

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 8, 2016
Online Publication Date Apr 1, 2016
Publication Date Apr 1, 2016
Deposit Date Apr 11, 2016
Publicly Available Date Apr 11, 2016
Journal PLoS ONE
Electronic ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 11
Issue 4
Article Number e0152086
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152086
Keywords Atrial fibrillation; Healthcare professionals; Primary care
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/778128
Publisher URL http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152086
Related Public URLs http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Contract Date Apr 11, 2016

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations