Terence Ong
ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
Ong, Terence; Suazo Di Paola, Ana; Brookes, Cassandra; Drummond, Avril; Hendrick, Paul; Leighton, Paul; Jones, Matthew; Salem, Khalid; Quraishi, Nasir; Sahota, Opinder
Authors
Ana Suazo Di Paola
Cassandra Brookes
Professor AVRIL DRUMMOND AVRIL.DRUMMOND@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF HEALTHCARE RESEARCH
Paul Hendrick
Dr PAUL LEIGHTON PAUL.LEIGHTON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF APPLIED HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Dr MATTHEW JONES MATTHEW.JONES3@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IN HEALTH ECONOMICS
Khalid Salem
Nasir Quraishi
Opinder Sahota
Abstract
Objective To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). Design Single-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. Setting A UK tertiary centre hospital. Participants Patients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF. Interventions The intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team. Primary and secondary outcome measures The feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events. Results 241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial. Conclusions There were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial. Trial registration number ISRCTN16719542.
Citation
Ong, T., Suazo Di Paola, A., Brookes, C., Drummond, A., Hendrick, P., Leighton, P., Jones, M., Salem, K., Quraishi, N., & Sahota, O. (2022). ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people. BMJ Open, 12(5), Article e050535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 21, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | May 3, 2022 |
Publication Date | May 3, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jul 14, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 14, 2022 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Electronic ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 5 |
Article Number | e050535 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535 |
Keywords | General Medicine |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7956725 |
Publisher URL | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/5/e050535 |
Files
Ong BMJ Open 2022
(477 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search