Elissa Madi
A comparison between two types of Fuzzy TOPSIS method
Madi, Elissa; Garibaldi, Jonathan M.; Wagner, Christian
Authors
Prof. JONATHAN GARIBALDI JON.GARIBALDI@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Provost and Pvc Unnc
CHRISTIAN WAGNER Christian.Wagner@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Computer Science
Abstract
Multi Criteria Decision Making methods have been developed to solve complex real-world decision problems. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is currently one of the most popular methods and has been shown to provide helpful outputs in various application areas. In recent years, a variety of extensions, including fuzzy extensions of TOPSIS have been proposed. One challenge that has arisen is that it is not straightforward to differentiate between the multiple variants of TOPSIS existing today. Thus, in this paper, a comparison between the classical Fuzzy TOPSIS method proposed by Chen in 2000 and the recently Fuzzy TOPSIS proposed extension by Yuen in 2014 is made. The purpose of this comparative study is to show the difference between both methods and to provide context for their respective strengths and limitations both in complexity of application, and expressiveness of results. A detailed synthetic numeric example and comparison of both methods are provided.
Citation
Madi, E., Garibaldi, J. M., & Wagner, C. (2015). A comparison between two types of Fuzzy TOPSIS method.
Conference Name | 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) |
---|---|
End Date | Oct 12, 2015 |
Acceptance Date | Oct 19, 2015 |
Publication Date | Oct 19, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jul 6, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 6, 2016 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Keywords | Fuzzy set theory, Multi criteria decision making, TOPSIS |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/763540 |
Publisher URL | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/abstractAuthors.jsp?arnumber=7379195 |
Additional Information | © 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. |
Contract Date | Jul 6, 2016 |
Files
camera ready n latest version.pdf
(279 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Eliciting human values for conservation planning and decisions: a global issue
(2016)
Journal Article
From Interval-Valued Data to General Type-2 Fuzzy Sets
(2014)
Journal Article
Extension of the Fuzzy Integral for General Fuzzy Set-Valued Information
(2014)
Journal Article
Applying interval type-2 fuzzy rule based classifiers through a cluster-based class representation
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Fuzzy integral for rule aggregation in fuzzy inference systems
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search