Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The distribution of reproductive risk factors disclosed the heterogeneity of receptor-defined breast cancer subtypes among Tanzanian women

Rweyemamu, Linus P.; Akan, Gokce; Adolf, Ismael C.; Magorosa, Erick P.; Mosha, Innocent J.; Dharsee, Nazima; Namkinga, Lucy A.; Lyantagaye, Sylvester L.; Nateri, Abdolrahman S.; Atalar, Fatmahan

The distribution of reproductive risk factors disclosed the heterogeneity of receptor-defined breast cancer subtypes among Tanzanian women Thumbnail


Authors

Linus P. Rweyemamu

Gokce Akan

Ismael C. Adolf

Erick P. Magorosa

Innocent J. Mosha

Nazima Dharsee

Lucy A. Namkinga

Sylvester L. Lyantagaye

Fatmahan Atalar



Abstract

Background: Recent epidemiological studies suggest that reproductive factors are associated with breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes. However, these associations have not been thoroughly studied in the African populations. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of BC molecular subtypes and assess their association with reproductive factors in Tanzanian BC patients. Methods: This hospital-based case-only cross-sectional study consisted of 263 histologically confirmed BC patients in Tanzania. Clinico-pathological data, socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and reproductive risk factors were examined using the Chi-square test and one-way ANOVA. The association among reproductive factors and BC molecular subtypes was analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. The heterogeneity of the associations was assessed using the Wald test. Results: We found evident subtype heterogeneity for reproductive factors. We observed that post-menopausal status was more prevalent in luminal-A subtype, while compared to luminal-A subtype, luminal-B and HER-2 enriched subtypes were less likely to be found in post-menopausal women (OR: 0.21, 95%CI 0.10–0.41, p = 0.001; OR: 0.39, 95%CI 0.17–0.89, p = 0.026, respectively). Also, the luminal-B subtype was more likely to be diagnosed in patients aged ≤ 40years than the luminal-A subtype (OR: 2.80, 95%CI 1.46–5.32, p = 0.002). Women who had their first full-term pregnancy at < 30years were more likely to be of luminal-B (OR: 2.71, 95%CI 1.18–4.17, p = 0.018), and triple-negative (OR: 2.28, 95%CI 1.02–4.07, p = 0.044) subtypes relative to luminal-A subtype. Furthermore, we observed that breastfeeding might have reduced odds of developing luminal-A, luminal-B and triple-negative subtypes. Women who never breastfed were more likely to be diagnosed with luminal-B and triple-negative subtypes when compared to luminal-A subtype (OR: 0.46, 95%CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.035; OR: 0.41, 95%CI 0.20–0.85, p = 0.017, respectively). Conclusion: Our results are the first data reporting reproductive factors heterogeneity among BC molecular subtypes in Tanzania. Our findings suggest that breast-feeding may reduce the likelihood of developing luminal-A, luminal-B, and triple-negative subtypes. Meanwhile, the first full-term pregnancy after 30years of age could increase the chance of developing luminal-A subtype, a highly prevalent subtype in Tanzania. More interventions to promote modifiable risk factors across multiple levels may most successfully reduce BC incidence in Africa.

Citation

Rweyemamu, L. P., Akan, G., Adolf, I. C., Magorosa, E. P., Mosha, I. J., Dharsee, N., Namkinga, L. A., Lyantagaye, S. L., Nateri, A. S., & Atalar, F. (2021). The distribution of reproductive risk factors disclosed the heterogeneity of receptor-defined breast cancer subtypes among Tanzanian women. BMC Women's Health, 21(1), Article 423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01536-6

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 8, 2021
Online Publication Date Dec 20, 2021
Publication Date Dec 1, 2021
Deposit Date Jan 14, 2022
Publicly Available Date Jan 17, 2022
Journal BMC Women's Health
Electronic ISSN 1472-6874
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 21
Issue 1
Article Number 423
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01536-6
Keywords Obstetrics and Gynecology; Reproductive Medicine; General Medicine
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7228610
Publisher URL https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-021-01536-6

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations