Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluation of the indoor pressure distribution during building airtightness tests using the pulse and blower door methods

Hsu, Yun-Sheng; Zheng, Xiaofeng; Cooper, Edward; Gillott, Mark; Wood, Christopher J.

Evaluation of the indoor pressure distribution during building airtightness tests using the pulse and blower door methods Thumbnail


Authors

Yun-Sheng Hsu

XIAOFENG ZHENG Xiaofeng.Zheng@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor - Building Services

Edward Cooper

MARK GILLOTT MARK.GILLOTT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Sustainable Building Design



Abstract

Building airtightness is a critical aspect for energy-efficient buildings as the energy performance of a building can be significantly reduced by poor airtightness. The Pulse technique has been regarded as a promising technology, measuring building airtightness at a low pressure of 4 Pa. However, due to the rapid dynamic nature of the test, a frequently raised question concerns the uniformity of the pressure distribution across the internal space of the test building during the air pulse release. In order to investigate this point, experimental work was conducted in a five-bedroom dwelling. All the tests were conducted at wind speeds less than 0.45 m/s to minimise the wind impact on the indoor pressure. The results show a pressure difference within the building during the Pulse test does exist, but considering the accuracy of differential pressure transducers, the deviation is not significant. In addition, a subtle variation is noted when the Pulse test was conducted at different locations on the ground floor, which may also be caused by variations in the environmental conditions. In terms of the airtightness measurement, a good overall agreement was found between the Pulse technique and the conventional blower door fan pressurisation method, which indirectly verified the uniformity of the indoor pressure distribution during both tests. Moreover, the error analysis demonstrated the validity of the measurement results for the two test methods in this study.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 20, 2021
Online Publication Date Feb 24, 2021
Publication Date May 15, 2021
Deposit Date Mar 17, 2021
Publicly Available Date Feb 25, 2022
Journal Building and Environment
Print ISSN 0360-1323
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 195
Article Number 107742
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107742
Keywords Geography, Planning and Development; Environmental Engineering; Civil and Structural Engineering; Building and Construction
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5353255
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132321001505