YAN CHEN Yan.Chen@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Digital Health
Relationship Between Mammography Readers Real-life Performance and Performance in a Test set Based Assessment Scheme in a National Breast Screening Programme
Chen, Yan; James, Jonathan J.; Cornford, Eleanor J.; Jenkins, Jacquie
Authors
Jonathan J. James
Eleanor J. Cornford
Jacquie Jenkins
Abstract
Purpose
To compare an individual’s Personal Performance in Mammographic Screening (PERFORMS) score with their Breast Screening Information System (BSIS) real-life performance data and determine which parameters in the PERFORMS scheme offer the best reflection of BSIS real-life performance metrics.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study, the BSIS real-life performance metrics of individual readers (n = 452) in the National Health Service Breast Screening Program (NHSBSP) in England were compared with performance in the test set–based assessment scheme over a 3-year period from 2013 to 2016. Cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated for each reader, for both real-life screening and the PERFORMS test. For each metric, real-life and test set versions were compared using a Pearson correlation. The real-life CDR, recall rate, and PPV of outliers were compared against other readers (nonoutliers) using analysis of variance.
Results
BSIS real-life CDRs, recall rates, and PPVs showed positive correlations with the equivalent PERFORMS measures (P < .001, P = .002, and P < .001, respectively). The mean real-life CDR of PERFORMS outliers was 7.2 per 1000 women screened and was significantly lower than other readers (nonoutliers) where the real-life CDR was 7.9 (P = .002). The mean real-life screening PPV of PERFORMS outliers was 0.14% and was significantly lower than the nonoutlier group who had a mean PPV of 0.17% (P = .006).
Conclusion
The use of test set–based assessment schemes in a breast screening program has the potential to predict and identify poor performance in real life.
Citation
Chen, Y., James, J. J., Cornford, E. J., & Jenkins, J. (2020). Relationship Between Mammography Readers Real-life Performance and Performance in a Test set Based Assessment Scheme in a National Breast Screening Programme. Radiology, 2(5), https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.2020200016
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 2, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 25, 2020 |
Publication Date | Sep 25, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jun 10, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 26, 2021 |
Journal | Radiology |
Print ISSN | 0033-8419 |
Publisher | Radiological Society of North America |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2 |
Issue | 5 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.2020200016 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4617698 |
Publisher URL | https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rycan.2020200016 |
Files
rycan.2020200016
(474 Kb)
PDF
Relationship Between Mammography Readers
(1.5 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Defining the road map to a UK national lung cancer screening programme
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search