Sky A. J. Tetlow
Welfare indicators for stunning versus non‐stunning slaughter in sheep and cattle: A scoping review
Tetlow, Sky A. J.; Brennan, Marnie L.; Garcia‐Ara, Amelia
Authors
Dr MARNIE BRENNAN MARNIE.BRENNAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Dr MARNIE BRENNAN MARNIE.BRENNAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Abstract
Background: While most cattle and sheep in the United Kingdom are stunned before slaughter, non-stun methods are permitted to supply meat to specific consumers. This study aimed to identify the existing literature that compared animal welfare indicators during stun and non-stun slaughter, using a scoping review framework. Method: Following a structured search strategy, including the establishment of a PICO (population, intervention, comparator and outcomes) question, a comprehensive literature search of the CAB Abstracts, MEDLINE and PubMed databases, was conducted. A total of 962 papers were identified, of which 16 were selected for data extraction. Results: Fourteen papers concluded that welfare at slaughter was negatively impacted at non-stun slaughter in comparison to stun slaughter; two papers were inconclusive. Welfare indicators identified included biochemical parameters, brain activity and visual signs of consciousness. Limitations regarding inconsistent restraint method, neck cut position and non-standardised measures of welfare at slaughter are highlighted. Conclusions: This study provides further evidence that stunning is an effective method to improve the welfare of sheep and cattle at slaughter. Animal welfare advisors, politicians, religious communities and others interested in animal welfare could use the findings to further discuss and establish new dialogues for producing updated guidance on animal welfare at slaughter.
Citation
Tetlow, S. A. J., Brennan, M. L., & Garcia‐Ara, A. (2022). Welfare indicators for stunning versus non‐stunning slaughter in sheep and cattle: A scoping review. Veterinary Record, 191(6), Article e1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1739
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 26, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 2, 2022 |
Publication Date | Sep 23, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Nov 25, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 25, 2022 |
Journal | Veterinary Record |
Print ISSN | 0042-4900 |
Electronic ISSN | 2042-7670 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 191 |
Issue | 6 |
Article Number | e1739 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1739 |
Keywords | General Veterinary; General Medicine |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/8857333 |
Publisher URL | https://bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/vetr.1739 |
Files
Welfare indicators for stunning versus non-stunning slaughter in sheep and cattle: A scoping review
(404 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Exploring the evidence base on grape (Vitis vinifera; VV) toxicity in dogs after ingestion - clinical effects, treatments, and types of VV fruit (VVF) implicated: A scoping review
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search