Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Intradialytic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Cardiovascular Responses in a Short-Term Trial of Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis

Buchanan, Charlotte; Mohammed, Azharuddin; Cox, Eleanor; K�hler, Katrin; Canaud, Bernard; Taal, Maarten W.; Selby, Nicholas Michael; Francis, Susan T.; McIntyre, Christopher W.

Intradialytic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Cardiovascular Responses in a Short-Term Trial of Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis Thumbnail


Authors

Azharuddin Mohammed

ELEANOR COX ELEANOR.COX@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow

Katrin K�hler

Bernard Canaud

Maarten W. Taal

Nicholas Michael Selby

Christopher W. McIntyre



Abstract

Hemodynamic stress during hemodialysis (HD) results in recurrent segmental ischemic injury (myocardial stunning) that drives cumulative cardiac damage. We performed a fully comprehensive study of the cardiovascular effect of dialysis sessions using intradialytic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine the comparative acute effects of standard HD versus hemodiafiltration (HDF) in stable patients. We randomly allocated 12 patients on HD (ages 32–72 years old) to either HD or HDF. Patients were stabilized on a modality for 2 weeks before undergoing serial cardiac MRI assessment during dialysis. Patients then crossed over to the other modality and were rescanned after 2 weeks. Cardiac MRI measurements included cardiac index, stroke volume index, global and regional contractile function (myocardial strain), coronary artery flow, andmyocardial perfusion. Patients had mean6SEMultrafiltration rates of 3.862.9 ml/kg per hour during HD and 4.462.5 ml/kg per hour during HDF (P=0.29), and both modalities provided a similar degree of cooling. All measures of systolic contractile function fell during HD and HDF, with partial recovery after dialysis. All patients experienced some degree of segmental left ventricular dysfunction, with severity proportional to ultrafiltration rate and BP reduction. Myocardial perfusion decreased significantly during HD and HDF. Treatment modality did not influence any of the cardiovascular responses to dialysis. In conclusion, in this randomized, crossover study, there was no significant difference in the cardiovascular response to HDF or HD with cooled dialysate as assessed with intradialytic MRI.

Citation

Buchanan, C., Mohammed, A., Cox, E., Köhler, K., Canaud, B., Taal, M. W., …McIntyre, C. W. (2017). Intradialytic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Cardiovascular Responses in a Short-Term Trial of Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 28(4), 1269-1277. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016060686

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 29, 2016
Online Publication Date Nov 10, 2016
Publication Date Apr 1, 2017
Deposit Date Dec 21, 2016
Publicly Available Date Dec 21, 2016
Journal Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Print ISSN 1046-6673
Electronic ISSN 1533-3450
Publisher American Society of Nephrology
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 28
Issue 4
Pages 1269-1277
DOI https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016060686
Keywords Haemodialysis, haemodiafiltration, cardiac stunning, randomised controlled trial, cardiac MRI
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/829137
Publisher URL https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/28/4/1269

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations