Javier Navarro
Exploring differences in interpretation of words essential in medical expert-patient communication
Navarro, Javier; Wagner, Christian; Aickelin, Uwe; Green, Lynsey; Robert, Ashford
Authors
Professor CHRISTIAN WAGNER Christian.Wagner@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
Uwe Aickelin
Lynsey Green
Ashford Robert
Abstract
In the context of cancer treatment and surgery, quality of life assessment is a crucial part of determining treatment success and viability. In order to assess it, patient-completed questionnaires which employ words to capture aspects of patients’ well-being are the norm. As the results of these questionnaires are often used to assess patient progress and to determine future treatment options, it is important to establish that the words used are interpreted in the same way by both patients and medical professionals. In this paper, we capture and model patients’ perceptions and associated uncertainty about the words used to describe the level of their physical function used in the highly common (in Sarcoma Services) Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) questionnaire. The paper provides detail about the interval-valued data capture as well as the subsequent modelling of the data using fuzzy sets. Based on an initial sample of participants, we use Jaccard similarity on the resulting words models to show that there may be considerable differences in the interpretation of commonly used questionnaire terms, thus presenting a very real risk of miscommunication between patients and medical professionals as well as within the group of medical professionals.
Citation
Navarro, J., Wagner, C., Aickelin, U., Green, L., & Robert, A. (2016, July). Exploring differences in interpretation of words essential in medical expert-patient communication. Presented at 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2016), Vancouver, Canada
Presentation Conference Type | Edited Proceedings |
---|---|
Conference Name | 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2016) |
Start Date | Jul 24, 2016 |
End Date | Jul 29, 2016 |
Acceptance Date | Mar 14, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 10, 2016 |
Publication Date | Nov 10, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 20, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 10, 2016 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Book Title | 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) |
Keywords | TESS, Survey data, Computing with Words, IntervalAgreement Approach, similarity, medicine, questionnaire |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/780511 |
Publisher URL | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7737959 |
Additional Information | Part of the IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. |
Contract Date | Jun 20, 2016 |
Files
Exploring Differences in Interpretation of Words Essential in Medical Expert-Patient Communication.pdf
(722 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Explain the world – Using causality to facilitate better rules for fuzzy systems
(2024)
Journal Article
Gradient-based Fuzzy System Optimisation via Automatic Differentiation – FuzzyR as a Use Case
(2024)
Preprint / Working Paper
Explaining time series classifiers through meaningful perturbation and optimisation
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search