Nde Eshimuni Salema
The frequency and nature of prescribing problems by GPs-in-training (REVISiT): a retrospective review
Salema, Nde Eshimuni; Bell, Brian; Marsden, Kate; Gookey, Gill; Swanwick, Glen; Bassi, Mindy; Mehta, Rajnikant; Silcock, Nick; Avery, Anthony J.; Knox, Richard
Authors
Dr BRIAN BELL BRIAN.BELL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
RESEARCH FELLOW
Kate Marsden
Gill Gookey
Glen Swanwick
Mindy Bassi
Rajnikant Mehta
Nick Silcock
Professor TONY AVERY ANTHONY.AVERY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Richard Knox
Abstract
Background: Prescribing errors can cause significant morbidity and occur in about 5% of prescriptions in English general practices. Aim: To describe the frequency and nature of prescribing problems in a cohort of GPs-in-training to determine whether they need additional prescribing support. Design & setting: A primary care pharmacist undertook a retrospective review of prescriptions issued between 9 October 2014 and 11 March 2015 by 10 GPs in their final year of training from 10 practices in England. Method: Pre-existing standards and expert panel discussion were used to classify the appropriateness of prescribing. Data were imported into Stata (version 13) to perform descriptive analysis. An individualised report highlighting prescribing errors, suboptimal prescribing, and areas of good practice identified during the review was shared with the GPs-in-training and their trainers. This report was used to guide discussions during the GP-in-training’s feedback session. Results: A total of 1028 prescription items were reviewed from 643 consultations performed by 10 GPs-in-training. There were 92 prescribing errors (8.9%) and 360 episodes of suboptimal prescribing (35.0%). The most common types of error concerned medication dosages (n = 30, 32.6% of errors). Conclusion: Personalised review of prescribing revealed an error rate higher than recorded in a previous similar study mainly comprising GPs who had completed postgraduate training, and a substantially higher rate of suboptimal prescribing. A larger intervention study is now required to evaluate the effectiveness of receiving a personalised review of prescribing, and to assess its impact on patient safety.
Citation
Salema, N. E., Bell, B., Marsden, K., Gookey, G., Swanwick, G., Bassi, M., Mehta, R., Silcock, N., Avery, A. J., & Knox, R. (2022). The frequency and nature of prescribing problems by GPs-in-training (REVISiT): a retrospective review. BJGP Open, 6(3), Article BJGPO.2021.0231. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0231
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 8, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 9, 2022 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Mar 22, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 17, 2022 |
Journal | BJGP Open |
Electronic ISSN | 2398-3795 |
Publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 3 |
Article Number | BJGPO.2021.0231 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0231 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7644956 |
Publisher URL | https://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2022/08/08/BJGPO.2021.0231 |
Files
frequency and nature of prescribing problems
(833 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
The impact of ageing on adults with cerebral palsy
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search