Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Stakeholder interpretation of probabilistic representations of uncertainty in spatial information: an example on the nutritional quality of staple crops

Chagumaira, Christopher; Nalivata, Patson C.; Chimungu, Joseph G.; Gashu, Dawd; Broadley, Martin R.; Milne, Alice E.; Lark, R. Murray

Stakeholder interpretation of probabilistic representations of uncertainty in spatial information: an example on the nutritional quality of staple crops Thumbnail


Authors

Christopher Chagumaira

Patson C. Nalivata

Joseph G. Chimungu

Dawd Gashu

Alice E. Milne

Profile Image

MURRAY LARK MURRAY.LARK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Geoinformatics



Abstract

Spatial information, inferred from samples, is needed for decision-making, but is uncertain. One way to convey uncertain information is with probabilities (e.g. that a value falls below a critical threshold). We examined how different professional groups (agricultural scientists or health and nutrition experts) interpret information, presented this way, when making a decision about interventions to address human selenium (Se) deficiency. The information provided was a map, either of the probability that Se concentration in local staple grain falls below a nutritionally-significant threshold (negative framing) or of the probability that grain Se concentration is above the threshold (positive framing). There was evidence for an effect of professional group and of framing on the decision process. Negative framing led to more conservative decisions; intervention was recommended at a smaller probability that the grain Se is inadequate than if the question were framed positively, and the decisions were more comparable between professional groups under negative framing. Our results show the importance of framing in probabilistic presentations of uncertainty, and of the background of the interpreter. Our experimental approach could be used to elicit threshold probabilities which represent the preferences of stakeholder communities to support them in the interpretation of uncertain information.

Citation

Chagumaira, C., Nalivata, P. C., Chimungu, J. G., Gashu, D., Broadley, M. R., Milne, A. E., & Lark, R. M. (2022). Stakeholder interpretation of probabilistic representations of uncertainty in spatial information: an example on the nutritional quality of staple crops. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36(12), 2446-2472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.2020278

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 15, 2021
Online Publication Date Mar 1, 2022
Publication Date Mar 1, 2022
Deposit Date Jan 6, 2022
Publicly Available Date Mar 1, 2022
Journal International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Print ISSN 1365-8816
Electronic ISSN 1362-3087
Publisher Informa UK Limited
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 36
Issue 12
Pages 2446-2472
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.2020278
Keywords Library and Information Sciences; Geography, Planning and Development; Information Systems
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7167728
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13658816.2021.2020278

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations