Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evaluation of an enhanced training package to support clinical trials training in low and middle income countries (LMICs): experiences from the Born Too Soon Optimising Nutrition study

Mitchell, Eleanor Jane; Aluvaala, Jalemba; Bradshaw, Lucy; Daniels, Jane; Kumar, Ashok; Opira, Jacqueline; Oliver, Mary; Pallotti, Phoebe; Qureshi, Zahida; Swinden, Richard; Were, Fredrick; Ojha, Shalini

Authors

Jalemba Aluvaala

Ashok Kumar

Jacqueline Opira

MARY OLIVER Mary.Oliver@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Science Education

Phoebe Pallotti

Zahida Qureshi

Richard Swinden

Fredrick Were

SHALINI OJHA Shalini.Ojha@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Neonatal Medicine



Abstract

Training is essential before working on a clinical trial, yet there is limited evidence on effective training methods. In low and middle income countries (LMICs), training of research staff was considered the second highest priority in a global health methodological research priority setting exercise. Methods We explored whether an enhanced training package in a neonatal feasibility study in Kenya and India, utilising elements of the train-the-trainer approach, altered clinicians and researchers’ clinical trials knowledge. A lead “trainer” was identified at each site who attended a UK-based introductory course on clinical trials. A two-day in-country training session was conducted at each hospital. Sessions included the study protocol, governance, data collection and ICH-Good Clinical Practice (GCP). To assess effectiveness of the training package, participants completed questionnaires at the start and end of the study period, including demographics, prior research experience, protocol-specific questions, informed consent and ICH-GCP. Results Thirty participants attended in-country training sessions and completed baseline questionnaires. Around three quarters had previously worked on a research study, yet only half had previously received training. Nineteen participants completed questionnaires at the end of the study period. Questionnaire scores were higher at the end of the study period, though not significantly so. Few participants ‘passed’ the informed consent and ICH-Good Clinical Practice (GCP) modules, using the Global Health Network Training Centre pass mark of ≥ 80%. Participants who reported having prior research experience scored higher in questionnaires before the start of the study period. Conclusions An enhanced training package can improve knowledge of research methods and governance though only small improvements in mean scores between questionnaires completed before and at the end of the study period were seen and were not statistically significant. This is the first report evaluating a clinical trial training package in a neonatal trial in LMICs. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, research activity was paused and there was a significant time lapse between training and start of the study, which likely impacted upon the scores reported here. Given the burden of disease in LMICs, developing high-quality training materials which utilise a variety of approaches and build research capacity, is critical.

Citation

Mitchell, E. J., Aluvaala, J., Bradshaw, L., Daniels, J., Kumar, A., Opira, J., …Ojha, S. Evaluation of an enhanced training package to support clinical trials training in low and middle income countries (LMICs): experiences from the Born Too Soon Optimising Nutrition study

Working Paper Type Working Paper
Deposit Date Aug 21, 2023
Publicly Available Date Aug 31, 2023
Publisher Springer Verlag
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5750767
Publisher URL https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-703406/v1
Additional Information This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations