Luis Mata
Indigenous plants promote insect biodiversity in urban greenspaces
Mata, Luis; Andersen, Alan N.; Mor�n-Ord��ez, Alejandra; Hahs, Amy K.; Ives, Christopher D.; Bickel, Daniel; Duncan, David; Palma, Estibaliz; Thomas, Freya; Cranney, Kate; Walker, Ken; Shears, Ian; Semeraro, Linda; Malipatil, Mallik; Moir, Melinda L; Plein, Michaela; Porch, Nick; Vesk, Peter A.; Smith, Tessa R.; Lynch, Yvonne
Authors
Alan N. Andersen
Alejandra Mor�n-Ord��ez
Amy K. Hahs
Dr CHRIS IVES CHRIS.IVES@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Daniel Bickel
David Duncan
Estibaliz Palma
Freya Thomas
Kate Cranney
Ken Walker
Ian Shears
Linda Semeraro
Mallik Malipatil
Melinda L Moir
Michaela Plein
Nick Porch
Peter A. Vesk
Tessa R. Smith
Yvonne Lynch
Abstract
The contribution of urban greenspaces to support biodiversity and provide benefits for people is increasingly recognized. However, ongoing management practices favor vegetation oversimplification, often limiting greenspaces to lawns and tree canopy rather than multi-layered vegetation that includes under- and midstorey, and the use of nonnative species. These practices hinder the potential of greenspaces to sustain indigenous biodiversity, particularly for taxa like insects that rely on plants for food and habitat. Yet, little is known about which plant species may maximize positive outcomes for taxonomically and functionally diverse insect communities in greenspaces. Additionally, while cities are expected to experience high rates of introductions, quantitative assessments of the relative occupancy of indigenous vs. introduced insect species in greenspace are rare, hindering understanding of how management may promote indigenous biodiversity while limiting the establishment of introduced insects. Using a hierarchically replicated study design across 15 public parks, we recorded occurrence data from 552 insect species on 133 plant species, differing in planting design element (lawn, midstorey, and tree canopy), midstorey growth form (forbs, lilioids, graminoids, and shrubs) and origin (nonnative, native, and indigenous), to assess (1) the relative contributions of indigenous and introduced insect species and (2) which plant species sustained the highest number of indigenous insects. We found that the insect community was overwhelmingly composed of indigenous rather than introduced species. Our findings further highlight the core role of multi-layered vegetation in sustaining high insect biodiversity in urban areas, with indigenous midstorey and canopy representing key elements to maintain rich and functionally diverse indigenous insect communities. Intriguingly, graminoids supported the highest indigenous insect richness across all studied growth forms by plant origin groups. Our work highlights the opportunity presented by indigenous understory and midstorey plants, particularly indigenous graminoids, in our study area to promote indigenous insect biodiversity in urban greenspaces. Our study provides a blueprint and stimulus for architects, engineers, developers, designers, and planners to incorporate into their practice plant species palettes that foster a larger presence of indigenous over regionally native or nonnative plant species, while incorporating a broader mixture of midstorey growth forms.
Citation
Mata, L., Andersen, A. N., Morán-Ordóñez, A., Hahs, A. K., Ives, C. D., Bickel, D., Duncan, D., Palma, E., Thomas, F., Cranney, K., Walker, K., Shears, I., Semeraro, L., Malipatil, M., Moir, M. L., Plein, M., Porch, N., Vesk, P. A., Smith, T. R., & Lynch, Y. (2021). Indigenous plants promote insect biodiversity in urban greenspaces. Ecological Applications, 31(4), Article e02309. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2309
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 30, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 19, 2021 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Feb 16, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 19, 2021 |
Journal | Ecological Applications |
Print ISSN | 1051-0761 |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-5582 |
Publisher | Ecological Society of America |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 31 |
Issue | 4 |
Article Number | e02309 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2309 |
Keywords | Ecology |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5330549 |
Files
Mata Et Al. (BioRxiv)
(2.6 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Engaging faith for a sustainable urban future
(2024)
Journal Article
The role of religion in shaping the values of nature
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search