Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Interventions for basal cell carcinoma: abridged Cochrane systematic review and grade assessments

Thomson, J.; Hogan, S.; Leonardi?Bee, J.; Williams, H.C.; Bath?Hextall, F.J.

Interventions for basal cell carcinoma: abridged Cochrane systematic review and grade assessments Thumbnail


Authors

J. Thomson

S. Hogan

F.J. Bath?Hextall



Abstract

Background
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest cancer affecting white‐skinned individuals, and worldwide incidence is increasing. Although rarely fatal, BCC is associated with significant morbidity and costs.

Objectives
To assess the effects of interventions for primary BCC in immunocompetent adults.

Methods
We updated our searches of the following databases to November 2019: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and LILACS. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

Results
We included 52 RCTs with 6990 participants (median age 65 years, range 20‐95). Mean study duration was 13 months (range 6 weeks to 10 years). Ninety‐two percent (48/52) of studies exclusively included histologically low‐risk BCC (nodular and superficial subtypes). The certainty of evidence was predominantly low or moderate for the outcomes of interest. Overall, surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates, and there may be slightly fewer recurrences with MMS over SE for primary, facial BCC (high‐risk histological subtype or located in the 'H‐zone' or both) (low‐certainty evidence). Non‐surgical treatments, when used for low‐risk BCC, are less effective than surgical treatments, but recurrence rates are acceptable and cosmetic outcomes are probably superior.

Conclusions
Surgical interventions have lower recurrence rates and remain the gold‐standard for high‐risk BCC. Of the non‐surgical treatments, topical imiquimod has the best evidence to support its efficacy for low‐risk BCC. Priorities for future research include agreement on core outcome measures and studies with longer follow‐up.

Citation

Thomson, J., Hogan, S., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Williams, H., & Bath‐Hextall, F. (2021). Interventions for basal cell carcinoma: abridged Cochrane systematic review and grade assessments. British Journal of Dermatology, 185(3), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19809

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 12, 2021
Online Publication Date May 5, 2021
Publication Date 2021-09
Deposit Date Jan 27, 2021
Publicly Available Date May 6, 2022
Journal British Journal of Dermatology
Print ISSN 0007-0963
Electronic ISSN 1365-2133
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 185
Issue 3
Pages 499-511
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19809
Keywords Dermatology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5234863
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjd.19809

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations