V�ronique Renault
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity measures and the main predictors of behaviour change: The first European-wide pilot study
Renault, V�ronique; Damiaans, Bert; Humblet, Marie?France; Jim�nez Ruiz, Sa�l; Garc�a Bocanegra, Ignacio; Brennan, Marnie L.; Casal, Jordi; Petit, Etienne; Pieper, Laura; Simoneit, Celine; Tourette, Isabelle; Wuyckhuise, Linda; Sarrazin, Steven; Dewulf, Jeroen; Saegerman, Claude
Authors
Bert Damiaans
Marie?France Humblet
Sa�l Jim�nez Ruiz
Ignacio Garc�a Bocanegra
Dr MARNIE BRENNAN MARNIE.BRENNAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
Jordi Casal
Etienne Petit
Laura Pieper
Celine Simoneit
Isabelle Tourette
Linda Wuyckhuise
Steven Sarrazin
Jeroen Dewulf
Claude Saegerman
Abstract
The importance of biosecurity as a strategy to prevent and control infectious diseases has increased substantially over the last few decades. Several studies have reported a low implementation level of biosecurity measures (BSM), particularly in cattle farms. In addition, a recent study demonstrated that cattle farmers are well aware of the recommended BSM and recognize them as more effective (in terms of time and costs) than treatment for disease. Therefore, other factors must be considered when it comes to understanding the decision-making process followed by a farmer regarding the adoption of BSM. This study analysed the possible influence of five mental constructs described in the health belief model (HBM) on the adoption of BSM and assessed the possible association of these constructs with different demographic and socio-psychological factors. Through an online survey, 988 questionnaires were completed by cattle farmers originating from Belgium, France, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands. The study revealed that the actual implementation of the BSM seems to be significantly influenced by the farmers’ perception of the measures’ benefits and the perception of health responsibility. Both constructs are influenced by the farmers’ personality in terms of risk aversion and biosecurity knowledge. It was also found that organic farmers had a significantly lower perception of the BSM benefits and of their responsibility towards animal, public and environmental health when compared with other types of farmer. Organic farmers in this study seemed less likely to implement biosecurity measures. To increase the adoption of BSM by cattle farmers, it is therefore important to emphasise the actual evidence-based benefits of the measures and to investigate further how to strengthen cattle farmers’ sense of responsibility towards animal, public and environmental health.
Citation
Renault, V., Damiaans, B., Humblet, M., Jiménez Ruiz, S., García Bocanegra, I., Brennan, M. L., Casal, J., Petit, E., Pieper, L., Simoneit, C., Tourette, I., Wuyckhuise, L., Sarrazin, S., Dewulf, J., & Saegerman, C. (2021). Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity measures and the main predictors of behaviour change: The first European-wide pilot study. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 68(6), 3305-3319. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13935
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 18, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 22, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-11 |
Deposit Date | Dec 7, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 23, 2021 |
Journal | Transboundary and Emerging Diseases |
Print ISSN | 1865-1674 |
Electronic ISSN | 1865-1682 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 68 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 3305-3319 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13935 |
Keywords | General Immunology and Microbiology; General Veterinary; General Medicine |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5125268 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tbed.13935 |
Additional Information | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Renault, V, Damiaans, B, Humblet, M‐F, et al. Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity measures and the main predictors of behaviour change: The first European‐wide pilot study. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13935. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. |
Files
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity (Table 3)
(32 Kb)
PDF
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity (Table 2)
(10 Kb)
PDF
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity (Table 1)
(79 Kb)
PDF
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity Appendix S3
(603 Kb)
PDF
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity Appendix S2
(547 Kb)
PDF
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity Appendix S1
(68 Kb)
PDF
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity (Figure 2)
(118 Kb)
Other
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity (Figure 1)
(131 Kb)
Other
Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity
(259 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Exploring the evidence base on grape (Vitis vinifera; VV) toxicity in dogs after ingestion - clinical effects, treatments, and types of VV fruit (VVF) implicated: A scoping review
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world
(2024)
Journal Article