Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The perceptual limitations of troubleshooting hearing-aids based on patients’ descriptions

Caswell-Midwinter, Benjamin; Whitmer, William M.

The perceptual limitations of troubleshooting hearing-aids based on patients’ descriptions Thumbnail


Authors

Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter



Abstract

Objectives: Hearing-aid frequency-gain responses are routinely adjusted by clinicians to patient preferences and descriptions. This study measured the minimum gain adjustments required to elicit preferences, and the assignment of descriptors to gain adjustments, to perceptually evaluate description-based troubleshooting. Design: Participants judged whether short sentences with ±0–12 dB gain adjustments in one of three frequency bands were “better”, “worse” or “no different” from the same sentence at their individual real-ear or prescribed gain. If judged “better” or “worse”, participants were then asked to assign one of the six common sound-quality descriptors to their preference. Study sample: Thirty-two adults (aged 51–75 years) all with hearing-aid experience. Results: Median preference thresholds, the minimum gain adjustments to elicit “better” or “worse” judgments, ranged from 4 to 12 dB, increasing with frequency. There was some between-participant agreement in preferences: participants generally preferred greater low-frequency gain. Within-participant reliability for preferences was moderate. There was, however, little between-participant agreement in descriptor selection for gain adjustments. Furthermore, within-participant reliability for descriptor selection was lacking. Conclusions: The scale of gain adjustments necessary to elicit preferences, along with the low agreement and reliability in descriptors for these adjustments questions the efficiency and efficacy of current description-based troubleshooting, especially with short speech stimuli.

Citation

Caswell-Midwinter, B., & Whitmer, W. M. (2021). The perceptual limitations of troubleshooting hearing-aids based on patients’ descriptions. International Journal of Audiology, 60(6), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1839679

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 15, 2020
Online Publication Date Nov 11, 2020
Publication Date 2021-09
Deposit Date Oct 19, 2020
Publicly Available Date Nov 12, 2021
Journal International Journal of Audiology
Print ISSN 1499-2027
Electronic ISSN 1708-8186
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 60
Issue 6
Pages 427-437
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1839679
Keywords Speech and Hearing; Linguistics and Language; Language and Linguistics
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4976985
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992027.2020.1839679

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations