Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter
The perceptual limitations of troubleshooting hearing-aids based on patients’ descriptions
Caswell-Midwinter, Benjamin; Whitmer, William M.
Abstract
Objectives: Hearing-aid frequency-gain responses are routinely adjusted by clinicians to patient preferences and descriptions. This study measured the minimum gain adjustments required to elicit preferences, and the assignment of descriptors to gain adjustments, to perceptually evaluate description-based troubleshooting. Design: Participants judged whether short sentences with ±0–12 dB gain adjustments in one of three frequency bands were “better”, “worse” or “no different” from the same sentence at their individual real-ear or prescribed gain. If judged “better” or “worse”, participants were then asked to assign one of the six common sound-quality descriptors to their preference. Study sample: Thirty-two adults (aged 51–75 years) all with hearing-aid experience. Results: Median preference thresholds, the minimum gain adjustments to elicit “better” or “worse” judgments, ranged from 4 to 12 dB, increasing with frequency. There was some between-participant agreement in preferences: participants generally preferred greater low-frequency gain. Within-participant reliability for preferences was moderate. There was, however, little between-participant agreement in descriptor selection for gain adjustments. Furthermore, within-participant reliability for descriptor selection was lacking. Conclusions: The scale of gain adjustments necessary to elicit preferences, along with the low agreement and reliability in descriptors for these adjustments questions the efficiency and efficacy of current description-based troubleshooting, especially with short speech stimuli.
Citation
Caswell-Midwinter, B., & Whitmer, W. M. (2021). The perceptual limitations of troubleshooting hearing-aids based on patients’ descriptions. International Journal of Audiology, 60(6), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1839679
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 15, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 11, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-09 |
Deposit Date | Oct 19, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 12, 2021 |
Journal | International Journal of Audiology |
Print ISSN | 1499-2027 |
Electronic ISSN | 1708-8186 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 60 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 427-437 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1839679 |
Keywords | Speech and Hearing; Linguistics and Language; Language and Linguistics |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4976985 |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992027.2020.1839679 |
Files
The perceptual limitations of troubleshooting hearing-aids based on patients’ descriptions
(2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Tinnitus, Suicide, and Suicidal Ideation: A Scoping Review of Primary Research
(2023)
Journal Article
The effect of stimulus duration on preferences for gain adjustments when listening to speech
(2021)
Journal Article
Clinical Trials and Outcome Measures in Adults With Hearing Loss
(2021)
Journal Article
Changes in Orientation Behavior due to Extended High-Frequency (5 to 10 kHz) Spatial Cues
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search