Do investigator meetings improve recruitment rates in clinical trials? A retrospective before-and-after study of data from nine multi-centre clinical trials

Mitchell, E. J.; Godolphin, P.; Meakin, G.; Sprange, K.

Abstract

© 2020 The Author(s). Background: Poor recruitment in clinical trials is well-documented. In large, multi-centre trials, communication between the coordinating centre and trial sites is essential. A commonly used communication tool is the hosting of an investigator/collaborator meeting, which offers an opportunity for sites to re-train and receive trial updates, learn from each other, share best practice and troubleshoot issues. Anecdotally, there is a perception that recruitment rates may increase after holding such a meeting. The aim of this before-and-after study was to examine any changes in recruitment after an investigator meeting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of nine trials at the Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU) that were open to recruitment between 2014 and 2018. In the 8 weeks prior to the date of the investigator meeting, 82 sites (across nine trials) were open to recruitment; 60 of which attended the meeting, 22 who did not. Using meeting attendance data available in Trial Master Files (TMF) and recruitment data from randomisation datasets, we examined recruitment rates in the 8 weeks prior to and following the date of the investigator meeting. Results: For the 82 sites included, 284 participants were recruited in the 8 weeks prior to the meeting, with a further 300 participants recruited in the 8 weeks post meeting. This gives a mean change in weekly recruitment of 0.073 (- 0.129, 0.275) per site, demonstrating no statistically significant increase in recruitment after the investigator meeting. For the 60 attending sites, recruitment increased from 254 participants prior to the meeting to 271 post meeting, giving a 0.100 (- 0.160, 0.360) mean change in weekly recruitment per site, providing no evidence that recruitment rates increase following an investigator meeting. Conclusion: There is no statistical evidence to conclude that holding an investigator meeting increases recruitment in the 8 weeks following the meeting. Thus, if the meeting has been held in the belief that it will have a positive impact upon recruitment, trialists may wish to consider other evidence-based strategies known to increase recruitment rates. However, since there are a variety of reasons why an investigator meeting may be held, trialists should continue to consider this as a communication strategy with sites.

Citation

Mitchell, E. J., Godolphin, P., Meakin, G., & Sprange, K. (2020). Do investigator meetings improve recruitment rates in clinical trials? A retrospective before-and-after study of data from nine multi-centre clinical trials. Trials, 21, Article 514. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04465-1

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 29, 2020
• Online Publication Date: Jun 10, 2020
• Publication Date: Jun 10, 2020
• Deposit Date: Sep 24, 2020
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 25, 2020
• Journal: Trials
• Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 21
• Article Number: 514
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04465-1
• Keywords: Medicine (miscellaneous); Pharmacology (medical)
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4631725
• Publisher URL: https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-020-04465-1