A. M. Joesbury
Repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement of prepreg tack following ASTM D8336: Results of a round-robin study
Joesbury, A. M.; Endruweit, A.; Budelmann, D.; Giannis, S. P.; De Focatiis, D. S.A.; Call, D. B.; Chan, C.; Choong, G. Y.H.; Clark, R. A.; Collins, J. A.; Fishpool, D. T.; Garber, J. M.; Ghose, S.; Golding, J.; Good, S. T.; Jones, B. R.; Meiners, D.; Niitsoo, O.; Palmer, C. T.; Qian, C. C.; Rivas, A. W.; Santacruz Rodriguez, G.; Stillwell, R. E.; Vincent, J. D.S.; Yuan, H.
Authors
Dr Andreas Endruweit ANDREAS.ENDRUWEIT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
D. Budelmann
S. P. Giannis
Dr DAVIDE DE FOCATIIS DAVIDE.DEFOCATIIS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
D. B. Call
C. Chan
G. Y.H. Choong
R. A. Clark
J. A. Collins
D. T. Fishpool
J. M. Garber
S. Ghose
J. Golding
S. T. Good
B. R. Jones
D. Meiners
O. Niitsoo
C. T. Palmer
C. C. Qian
A. W. Rivas
G. Santacruz Rodriguez
R. E. Stillwell
J. D.S. Vincent
H. Yuan
Abstract
This study reports the findings from a round robin test exercise investigating ASTM D8336, a method for the measurement of tack of prepregs applicable to automated material placement technologies. Twelve participants tested two prepreg materials in a core study of three temperature and deposition/peel rate combinations, and five participants conducted an extended study based on a test matrix of four temperatures and four rates. In the core study, the repeatability coefficient of variation of obtained tack values ranged from 6.06 % to 15.08 %, while the reproducibility coefficient of variation ranged from 12.37 % to 32.37 %. The probable dominant causes for the observed variability are the limited accuracy of control and measurement of specimen temperature, of compaction force, and of humidity. Using time–temperature superposition, tack mastercurves were constructed from the extended study, identifying values of peak tack, the rate at peak tack and the width of the tack mastercurve, as well as the 95 % confidence and prediction bands. Across all materials and participants, 93.3 % of the repeats from the core study lay within the 95 % prediction bands, supporting the view that a mastercurve provides a greater degree of useful information at a comparable effort for data acquisition.
Citation
Joesbury, A. M., Endruweit, A., Budelmann, D., Giannis, S. P., De Focatiis, D. S., Call, D. B., Chan, C., Choong, G. Y., Clark, R. A., Collins, J. A., Fishpool, D. T., Garber, J. M., Ghose, S., Golding, J., Good, S. T., Jones, B. R., Meiners, D., Niitsoo, O., Palmer, C. T., Qian, C. C., …Yuan, H. (2025). Repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement of prepreg tack following ASTM D8336: Results of a round-robin study. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 188, Article 108561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108561
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 25, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 1, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2025-01 |
Deposit Date | Nov 6, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 2, 2025 |
Journal | Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing |
Print ISSN | 1359-835X |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-5840 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 188 |
Article Number | 108561 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108561 |
Keywords | A Prepreg; B Adhesion; E Automated Fibre Placement |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/41547821 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X24005591#ak005 |
Additional Information | This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement of prepreg tack following ASTM D8336: Results of a round-robin study; Journal Title: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108561; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
Files
Repeatability and reproducibility of the measurement of prepreg tack following ASTM D8336: Results of a round-robin study
(3.8 Mb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
1359-835X/© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
You might also like
Real-time Bayesian inversion in resin transfer moulding using neural surrogates
(2024)
Journal Article
Out-of-plane permeability measurement for reinforcement textiles: A benchmark exercise
(2021)
Journal Article
Analysis of contact area in a continuous application-and-peel test method for prepreg tack
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search