Marianna Kyriacou
Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up?
Kyriacou, Marianna; Conklin, Kathy; Thompson, Dominic
Authors
KATHY CONKLIN K.CONKLIN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Psycholinguistics
DOMINIC THOMPSON DOMINIC.THOMPSON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Abstract
A growing number of studies support the partial compositionality of idiomatic phrases, while idioms are thought to vary in their syntactic flexibility. Some idioms, like kick the bucket, have been classified as inflexible and incapable of being passivized without losing their figurative interpretation (i.e., the bucket was kicked ≠ died). Crucially, this has never been substantiated by empirical findings. In the current study, we used eye-tracking to examine whether the passive forms of (flexible and inflexible) idioms retain or lose their figurative meaning. Active and passivized idioms (he kicked the bucket/the bucket was kicked) and incongruous active and passive control phrases (he kicked the apple/the apple was kicked) were inserted in sentences biasing the figurative meaning of the respective idiom (die). Active idioms served as a baseline. We hypothesized that if passivized idioms retain their figurative meaning (the bucket was kicked = died), they should be processed more efficiently than the control phrases, since their figurative meaning would be congruous in the context. If, on the other hand, passivized idioms lose their figurative interpretation (the bucket was kicked = the pail was kicked), then their meaning should be just as incongruous as that of both control phrases, in which case we would expect no difference in their processing. Eye movement patterns demonstrated a processing advantage for passivized idioms (flexible and inflexible) over control phrases, thus indicating that their figurative meaning was not compromised. These findings challenge classifications of idiom flexibility and highlight the creative nature of language.
Citation
Kyriacou, M., Conklin, K., & Thompson, D. (2020). Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up?. Language and Speech, 63(2), 404-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919847691
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 10, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | May 19, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Feb 16, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 17, 2020 |
Journal | Language and Speech |
Print ISSN | 0023-8309 |
Electronic ISSN | 1756-6053 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 63 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 404-435 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919847691 |
Keywords | idioms, passive voice, syntactic flexibility, eye-tracking, reading, processing |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3962245 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023830919847691 |
Files
Passivizability Of Idioms Manuscript Revised Manuscript Final
(933 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
When the Idiom Advantage Comes Up Short: Eye-Tracking Canonical and Modified Idioms
(2021)
Journal Article
Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task
(2011)
Journal Article
Incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary through brief multi-modal exposure
(2013)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search