Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review

Brain, Jacob; Kafadar, Aysegul Humeyra; Errington, Linda; Kirkley, Rachael; Tang, Eugene Y. H.; Akyea, Ralph K.; Bains, Manpreet; Brayne, Carol; Figueredo, Grazziela; Greene, Leanne; Louise, Jennie; Morgan, Catharine; Pakpahan, Eduwin; Reeves, David; Robinson, Louise; Salter, Amy; Siervo, Mario; Tully, Phillip J.; Turnbull, Deborah; Qureshi, Nadeem; Stephan, Blossom C. M.

What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review Thumbnail


Authors

Jacob Brain

Aysegul Humeyra Kafadar

Linda Errington

Rachael Kirkley

Eugene Y. H. Tang

Carol Brayne

Leanne Greene

Jennie Louise

Catharine Morgan

Eduwin Pakpahan

David Reeves

Louise Robinson

Amy Salter

Mario Siervo

Phillip J. Tully

Deborah Turnbull

Blossom C. M. Stephan



Abstract

Identifying individuals at high risk of dementia is critical to optimized clinical care, formulating effective preventative strategies, and determining eligibility for clinical trials. Since our previous systematic reviews in 2010 and 2015, there has been a surge in dementia risk prediction modelling. The aim of this study was to update our previous reviews to explore, and critically review, new developments in dementia risk modelling. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from March 2014 to June 2022. Studies were included if they were population- or community-based cohorts (including electronic health record data), had developed a model for predicting late-life incident dementia, and included model performance indices such as discrimination, calibration, or external validation. In total, 9,209 articles were identified from the electronic search, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. We found a substantial increase in the number of new models published from 2014 (>50 new models), including an increase in the number of models developed using machine learning. Over 450 unique predictor (component) variables have been tested. Nineteen studies (26%) undertook external validation of newly developed or existing models, with mixed results. For the first time, models have also been developed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and others validated in racial and ethnic minority groups. The literature on dementia risk prediction modelling is rapidly evolving with new analytical developments and testing in LMICs. However, it is still challenging to make recommendations about which one model is the most suitable for routine use in a clinical setting. There is an urgent need to develop a suitable, robust, validated risk prediction model in the general population that can be widely implemented in clinical practice to improve dementia prevention.

Citation

Brain, J., Kafadar, A. H., Errington, L., Kirkley, R., Tang, E. Y. H., Akyea, R. K., Bains, M., Brayne, C., Figueredo, G., Greene, L., Louise, J., Morgan, C., Pakpahan, E., Reeves, D., Robinson, L., Salter, A., Siervo, M., Tully, P. J., Turnbull, D., Qureshi, N., & Stephan, B. C. M. (2024). What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 14(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000539744

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 7, 2024
Online Publication Date Jun 10, 2024
Publication Date Jun 10, 2024
Deposit Date Mar 3, 2025
Publicly Available Date Mar 4, 2025
Journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Electronic ISSN 1664-5464
Publisher Karger Publishers
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Issue 1
Pages 49-74
DOI https://doi.org/10.1159/000539744
Keywords Statistical model, Incidence, Alzheimer disease, Risk prediction, Dementia
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/38100738
Publisher URL https://karger.com/dee/article/14/1/49/909048/What-s-New-in-Dementia-Risk-Prediction-Modelling